User talk:Kellykries

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Kellykries, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! jonkerz ♠talk 07:26, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ropalidia fasciata has been accepted[edit]

Ropalidia fasciata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:55, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image concerns[edit]

Hi Kellykries. Thank you for your additions to wasp articles. I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and part of my job is support editors like you with your contributions to Wikipedia. I have some concerns about whether some of the images you uploaded as 'freely available' are actually available under licenses that are compatible with use on Wikipedia. While you tagged File:Ropalidia fasciata.jpg with a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license, the original clearly has a dollar sign with a line through it, which means that it is available under a non-commercial license (which is incompatible with Wikipedia's licensing). In the case of File:Protonectarina sylveirae.JPG, I don't see anything on the source page that indicates licensing; am I missing something? Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ian! I'm sorry if I misunderstood what images are available to use. The image for Ropalidia fasciata was accompanied by similar icons as what was listed under that licensing descriptions provided by Wikipedia. The image for Protonectarina sylveirae was included in one of my cited sources-- I guess I'm just not understanding how images are different from the information included in the body of my article. Even if the content is from the same source, is it okay to include cited information, but not cited images? I'll be happy to try to remedy the issue if I included images I shouldn't have. Sorry! Thanks for your help. Kellykries (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The key difference with the Ropalidia fasciata image was the line through the dollar sign. Creative Commons licences exist in various forms, some of which are compatible with Wikipedia, others which are not. Wikipedia content is CC-by-SA - "share alike" - you can use it in any way you want as long as you don't claim that your additions create a new copyright that's more restrictive than the original. Some people release content as CC-by-ND - that means you can reproduce the work in any way you want (reprint text, redistribution an image) as long as you don't make 'derivative works' - you can't change the ending of someone's play, or draw a mustache on a photograph. Others (like the R. fasciata image) are CC-by-NC - they can be used in any way, as long as it's non-commercial.

Information isn't subject to copyright, but images, like articles are. An articles, a book, a work of music or painting - all of these are considered copyright, and you can't reproduce them as is without infringing on someone's copyright. Content is information - you could measure the lengths of a wasp based on an image, you could describe its coloration, you could count its legs - all without violating copyright. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:08, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Protonectarina sylveirae has been accepted[edit]

Protonectarina sylveirae, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:28, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know...?[edit]

Thank you for your recent contribution to Protonectarina.

I wonder if you would like to consider submitting it as a candidate for the "Did you know...?" feature. DYKs (as they are commonly called) are short snippets taken from Wikipedia's newest articles and, if approved, appear on the Main Page. You can learn more about this at Wikipedia:Did you know.

Your article Protonectarina appears to meet the criteria for submission as a DYK, but would be greatly improved if you expanded the lead section to briefly summarize the main points of the article. If you choose to submit a short (and interesting) fact from your article, please read the rules and the supplementary guidelines carefully. Please ask me if you have further questions.

According to the DYK tool, your article was created or expanded on October 16. DYKs must be nominated within 7 days of the creation or 5-fold expansion of the article, so if you choose to submit your article, please act quickly! Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I reviewed the article at DYK nominations. Check out. Regards -Nizil (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Protonectarina[edit]

On 12 November 2014, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Protonectarina, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Protonectarina sylveirae can increase the yield of coffee crops? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Protonectarina. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Protonectarina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]