User talk:Kellym133

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising in articles. For more information on this, see

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Dancter 04:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dancter[edit]

Thanks for your e-mail. I reviewed posting guidelines before posting links for "further reading" to my academic articles that are available for free on the Social Science Research Network. Per the guidelines, I am not selling anything and am only linking when there is a clear connection to the subject matter of the article that I have published in an academic journal (where I am the copyright holder) and where no one else has included a link with the same infomation as an external link or reference to the Wiki entry. I appreciate your note and am glad that active monitoring is occuring here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kellym133 (talk • contribs) 04:17, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

"Promotional purposes" includes more than just financial gain. At the very least, I would appreciate it if you didn't list your works at the top' of the lists. Due to the inherent conflict of interest in listing your own works, prioritizing them as such tends to set off the radars of spam and POV watchdogs. They should either go on the bottom if the lists are unordered, or according to scheme already established, such as alphabetical. Also, the fact that you are rather mechanically listing your works in articles, rather than using them to contribute organically to the actual article texts is a cause for concern. If you have content that is of value to Wikipedia readers, why not add it to Wikipedia, and use your published works as references? In the future, please try and comment and discuss your additions in the article talk pages beforehand. Dancter 05:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam[edit]

This user has added some four dozen or more links (sample here) in what appears to have been just five days of editing. Best case scenario: the editor who spammed the links removes them voluntarily. Conscientious neutral point of view editors will remove them in any case. — Athænara ✉ 07:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• COI additions (some identical, some similar) by 147.134.170.33 have also been removed. — Athænara ✉ 19:32, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Response[edit]

I resent the use of the word "spam" by Athaenara to characterize my references; I am a tenured professor of law and am adding to the resource base of the relevant articles. I am pushing neither an agenda nor myself, but contributing to the material by way of further explanation of underlying theories that are only treated lightly in the entries themselves.

That said, Dancter's suggestion is a good one, and I will endeavor to add content to the actual entries themselves in an attempt to flesh out some of the academic debate concerning the subjects covered and then include citations to my fuller works in the references as opposed to seperate sections for further reading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kellym133 (talk • contribs) 21:27, April 4 2007 (UTC)

What Dancter actually said was "comment and discuss your additions in the article talk pages," which is in accordance with Wikipedia policies and guidelines, seven of which are linked on this page.
Please read and respect them—they apply to every contributor to this encyclopedia regardless of individual credentials. You may understand the processes better if you read the Consensus policy page as well. — Athænara ✉ 23:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Further reading

Creighton University School of Law[edit]

Copyright problems[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Creighton University School of Law, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://law.creighton.edu/?about. As a copyright violation, Creighton University School of Law appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Creighton University School of Law has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Anaxial (talk) 19:45, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kellym133&oldid=551746119"