User talk:Kelseyjohnson123

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Hello, Kelseyjohnson123, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Soch Na Sake seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Huggums537 (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ELNO[edit]

Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Kelseyjohnson123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #24901 was submitted on Apr 25, 2019 12:29:27. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 12:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. [1] GermanJoe (talk) 07:58, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020[edit]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Maha Shivaratri. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 11:04, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Maha Shivaratri. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:14, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rudra centre moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Rudra centre, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 08:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rudra centre[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rudra centre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. N0nsensical.system^(err0r?)_(.log) 09:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Kelseyjohnson123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Kelseyjohnson123 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Sonampurohit". The reason given for Sonampurohit's block is: "Using Wikipedia for promotion or advertising purposes".

Blocking administrator: ‪Materialscientist‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You're both spamming. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelseyjohnson123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not adding links recently and if i added any link it will be helpful for wiki user, I also want to create wiki page so i am creating Unique content and high quality content.Please remove my ip and my user name from blocked list

Decline reason:

Since you don't think you did what it is that you did, and want to keep doing it, there are no grounds to remove the block, and I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 09:48, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelseyjohnson123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why you declined my unblock request.you block my ip not my user name and my mail id.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelseyjohnson123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

But all chnages done by Sonampurohit and i saw block massage and that was clearly wrote your ip is block due to suspicious activity done by Sonamapurohit.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you.

You are blocked for adding spam links as recently as February, 2020.--

HERE, HERE, HERE, and HERE ( there are more).

Please explain in your own words what WP:EL has to say about the addition of external links. Please affirm that you will no longer add links to or write about .rudraksha-ratna.com. Nor may you edit about Rudra centre. Do you have an outside connection to this website? Please affirm you will no longer add non conforming external links. Please describe what constructive edits you would make. I see no evidence of the "high quality edits" you refer to. Only spam. Please describe how it is you came to make the same sort of edits as Sonampurohit Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:40, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelseyjohnson123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes, I am working with Rudra centre. I want to update our previous Link which are archived by wiki.Please unblock me for update the links and also care about external links for future.If now you catch Spa links then block me bit i saw many other link on wiki page are also spam and promotional.

Decline reason:

This is borderline incoherent and in any case, does not address that all you've done here is spam. You seem to be claiming because other articles contain spam that we haven't yet found and removed, you should be free to spam. That's deeply, deeply inappropriate and shows you should not be unblocked. This is specifically addressed in WP:OTHERSTUFF. Yamla (talk) 14:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kelseyjohnson123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thanks Wiki

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ST47 (talk) 05:32, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.