User talk:Kenneth.leep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Review[edit]

Well done review - you pointed out more details than I could have! Overall, I think the updates are well done and I think your changes throughout out the article improved it. Marciaharrison (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review feedback[edit]

Overall I thought the general edits you made were good. The introduction to the paedomorphosis section confused me slightly in defining what paedomorphosis is. Generally I've heard the term used interchangeably with neoteny so I'm going off the assumption that your distinction of neoteny as a "subclass" is correct. The following sentence also makes it sound like juvenile development is extended instead of juvenile characteristics being retained in adulthood: 'Species that display neoteny do eventually reach an adult morphology, but have an extended childhood compared to their close evolutionary relatives.' Neoteny also has both a genetic and environmental component. Maybe discuss how the two differ and can drive development? Leahc 10 (talk) 15:08, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kenneth.leep, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 13 February[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]