User talk:Kennethtamara

Respect[edit]

Thanks for noticing this. There are also a hosts of other artsists that have more than two external links. Are you gonna go suggest to them to delete their external links?

The issue is not with the number of links, but with their nature. If you had read some of the pages linked below, you would see that MySpace and Facebook pages are considered inappropriate for a Wikipedia page. You can read a guide of what links to avoid here.

Also, it is considered proper format to post new comments at the bottom of a talk page rather than the top. Thank you for your contributions, and you can contact me at my talk page if you have any further questions.-Running On Brains 22:34, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RunningonBrains, have you looked at Angelique Kidjos poage? Or Kelly Clarkson, or other more established artists? I dont see you deleting their MySpace pages there. Pls quit with this vadalism, and quit acting like a simple juvenile.

January 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to Samsong do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Running On Brains 01:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Benson Idahosa[edit]

The issue is with the fact that you used some parameters which do not exist with {{Infobox person}}. I have fixed it. Note that the syntax for templates such as this can be a bit confusing, so feel free to ask me if you have trouble in the future. Help:Template may be a good read if you're interested.

Also, when posting on talk pages, it is Wikipedia convention to post at the bottom of the page, not the top. Have a nice day! -RunningOnBrains^{(talk page)} 04:16, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Darryl Foster[edit]

Enjoyed the article very much. Lionel (talk) 04:14, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For an editor without many contributions under their belt, the article was well written and very complete. I edit many of the ex-gay articles, and they suffer from 3 issues: (1) APA has discredited conversion therapy, (2) Wayne Besen has libeled most of the people involved with the movement and his opinions are introduced as WP:RS (3) the ex-gays relapse into homosexuality. For an example of this see an article I created which was subsequently "edited": Homosexuals Anonymous. Foster's article, as of yet, isn't plagued by these issues. Btw, Foster's pic is missing permission which means that it will be deleted sooner or later. Lionel (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New articles[edit]

May I recommend creating an article for Rev Jackson Tugbeh as a subpage of your own... for example create an article like this Jackson Tugbeh until you have it complete then create it as normal. CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:47, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Lionel, dont get it twisted. I'm not tripping cos I'm blocked. I'm not even begging to be unblocked. As far as I'm concerned, this is all a sexuality influenced decision, so I'm done. You guys wanna delete Darryl's page because some lesbian screamed foul, go right ahead. Have a field day. Hope it adds meaning and purpose to your existence. Enough said. Kennethtamara (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Osene Ighodaro for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osene Ighodaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osene Ighodaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:23, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jackson Tugbeh[edit]

The article Jackson Tugbeh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:41, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]