User talk:Kgm2019

(Kgm2019 (talk) 22:17, 5 January 2019 (UTC)) hi guys this is my first time here so help me where necessary[reply]

Your userpage[edit]

Sorry, but as you copied your user page from User:HonorTheKing I've had to delete it. Please don't just copy other users pages. Please see our pages concerning copyright and attributing others work for some guidance on how to proceed. Nick (talk) 22:59, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

😜😜sure Kgm2019 (talk) 07:59, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgm2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

am here to make Wikipedia a better place the thing is am still editing my page you can't expect me to edit wikipedia whereas my page is lookin horrible 😣 block me jus know that you have a wrong impression abt me so go ahead sir/madam Kgm2019 (talk) 16:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't seem to be asking to be unblocked. I note that you had not made one edit to an article, only to your user page and some other non-article pages. If you are here to make Wikipedia a better place, you will need to explain exactly how you will do that and worry less about your user page. No one needs a user page; there are users that have been here a decade and never once edited their user page. You will need to show that you are here for some other reason than improving your user page. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Kgm2019 (talk) 17:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC))ok thank you so if you block me does that mean that I won't be able to edit wikipedia?... Guess I have to start working on wikipedia😜[reply]

Your block prevents you from editing Wikipedia. If you want to edit Wikipedia, you need to make a successful unblock request. 331dot (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Kgm2019 (talk) 17:22, 6 January 2019 (UTC)) I deserve a chance jus like anyone + am jus a beginner at this.Ok am jus planning that we change some appearances to wikipedia am talking abt the first page of wikipedia and also I think there should be Wikipedia in other languages..I haven't seen Wikipedia in my language which eventually leads to language barrier✌[reply]

There are versions of Wikipedia in many languages. You should be able to access them by going to this page which has some of the more well known languages, and a menu with other languages. If you want to use another language version of Wikipedia, you may do so, as your block only keeps you from editing the English version.

If you want to propose changes in the appearance of the Main Page, good luck- that has been tried and failed by probably thousands of people, as while people can agree that it needs to be changed, they disagree as to what the changes should be. If you want to propose a change, you will be taken more seriously if you first develop an edit history that shows you are aware of how things work on Wikipedia and its policies. You will, as I said, first need to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Kgm2019 (talk) 17:42, 6 January 2019 (UTC))but my language is not included 😣....plzz unblock me 🙏[reply]

To be unblocked, you will need to make a successful unblock request, which explains that you know why you were blocked and also what you will edit about if unblocked. If you make another request, it will be reviewed by someone else. 331dot (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Kgm2019 (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2019 (UTC))ok I now understand I will edit some pages that have long been deserted and also I will block users who did the same mistake I did[reply]

Only administrators may block users. Your block will keep you from editing any page other than this one. If you want to edit another page, you must make a new unblock request as I state above. 331dot (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If administrators cannot figure out that this user is incompetent, a troll, or both, then I'm not sure what it takes.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Kgm2019 (talk) 18:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC))Am sorry forgive me but are you not an admin t thank you for your t[reply]

ime

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgm2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Am blocked but then you want to make wikipedia a better place I think there is some contradiction.How can Wikipedia get better when you don't allow room for mistake from other people like I said it was my first time here so blocking me will eventually make wikipedia stagnant jus imagine ....people will get wrong information from some other pages that I could have corrected am jus a beginner at this so practice makes perfect am here to make a difference so you won't see the difference I will make when you block me Kgm2019 (talk) 19:24, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Come back after you get some experience at tn:Main Page. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 22:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As you seem to be from Botswana, might I suggest you try the Setswana Wikipedia? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:42, 6 January 2019 (UT

(Kgm2019 (talk) 20:06, 6 January 2019 (UTC)) thank you so much😣😣i have been looking for it thank you jpgordon💪 (Kgm2019 (talk) 06:10, 7 January 2019 (UTC)) how I do I become an admin[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgm2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do now have experience but I jus know that am being blocked for personal reasons I learnt my lesson and I will never repeat the same mistake again ..But are you blocking me jus bcoz I had no experience??Kgm2019 (talk) 08:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Personal reasons and lack of experience are not the reason for your block. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:24, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2019[edit]

Hello, Kgm2019, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Qrc2006 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. It's very strange that your first edit should be to the talk page of Cholga (talk · contribs), a sockpuppet of Qrc2006 (talk · contribs). On that basis, and that basis alone, I'm asking you for an explanation. Regards, Cabayi (talk) 11:36, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kgm2019, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Kgm2019! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgm2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i will edit some of the deserted pages and also update some info wher necessaryKgm2019 (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgm2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer needed because i understand what i was blocked for, i will not do it again and i will make good changes instead.Kgm2019 (talk) 09:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So sorry. I cannot unblock you at this time. Please address the sockpuppetry issue mentioned here. Please be more specific in what constructive edits you would make. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:33, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kgm2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is no longer necessary because i understand what i have been blocked for, I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions insteadKgm2019 (talk) 11:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:29, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked[edit]

This user just isn't getting it. After six unblock requests, I have now revoked talk page access. This leaves WP:UTRS available, if the current unblock request is declined. However, Kgm2019, you'll need to thoroughly read and understand WP:GAB before taking advantage of that. If you continue along your current path, you'll find UTRS shut off for you as well. --Yamla (talk) 13:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]