User talk:KihoDeal
I've read the note you left at Talk:Manorplan Leisure. Your argument is a familiar one to Wikipedia editors and is covered by the policy at WP:WAX, or the "What about X?" policy. Essentially, we're not talking about other pages, we're talking about the Manorplan Leisure page; it is assessed entirely in terms of the material that is found in that article, and there is no assertion of notability or reliable sources that demonstrate that notability. If there are other pages in Wikipedia that you feel are inappropriate, you're welcome to try to have them deleted in the same way as this one will be. If you have any questions about Wikipedia policy, you can leave me a note. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:13, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
The article Tornado (Särkänniemi) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No sources given and article does not show any notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 23:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Jet Star (Särkänniemi) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No independent reliable sources given and article does not show any notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 23:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Korkkiruuvi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No independent reliable sources given and article does not show any notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 23:10, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Trombi (roller coaster) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No independent reliable sources given and article does not show any notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
The article Vauhtimato has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No independent reliable sources given and article does not show any notability
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LogicalFinance33 (talk) 23:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Logo Linnanmäki.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Logo Linnanmäki.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)