User talk:Kimaleec

Hello Kimaleec, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Kimaleec, good luck, and have fun. – Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) ^talk 10:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've been blocked for excessive editing. I didn't notice the message. Totally my bad and I take full responsibility. I would like to be unblocked now that I understand what I was doing wrong. I'm not sure exactly how to do that. I'm hoping you can help me. Kimaleec (talk) 21:35, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Kimaleec. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kimaleec. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Kimaleec. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rebecca Harper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emily Rose. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actors’ names in plot[edit]

Hi. Per the Wiki on MOS:FILMPLOT , it says "Do not include actors' names in the plot summary, as it is redundant to the ‘Cast’ section." I saw you restored actors’ names to plots so I thought I’d let you know. Spectrallights (talk) 00:39, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Masquerade (1988 film)

added links pointing to John Glover and Brian Davies

Illegally Yours

added a link pointing to Jessica James

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Men of Honor ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Per the above notice, please stop adding cast members to the Plot section of film articles when there's already a Cast section. DonIago (talk) 17:12, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Holes (film). See above warnings. DonIago (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I don't understand why I've been blocked. I didn't notice your message before so sorry about that.

I don't know what I did wrong Kimaleec (talk) 19:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to read MOS:FILMPLOT, as you were advised to do three days ago. I also noted your problematic behavior in my first warning under this section. DonIago (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again I apologize for not noticing I had a message. I will read.

Again, I apologize. Kimaleec (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you will unblock me I can go back and remove what I did.

I just saw that sometimes the actors were listed in the plot summary and sometimes they weren't so.....

I was just bored at work and found something to pass the time.

But I can totally undo it. I would hate for someone to have to that.

Totally my bad!!! I feel really bad that this cause an issue. Kimaleec (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, so I can't unblock you, but directions for how you can request an unblock are listed in the block notice. DonIago (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kimaleec (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you will unblock me I can go back and remove what I did. I just saw that sometimes the actors were listed in the plot summary and sometimes they weren't so..... I was just bored at work and found something to pass the time. But I can totally undo it. I would hate for someone to have to that. Totally my bad!!! I feel really bad that this cause an issue. Kimaleec (talk) 21:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: Fixed unblock request formatting. 199.208.172.35 (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]