User talk:Klinton Edvan

Hii This is a talk Page. here you can add a genuine details about this page which may improves this Article.--Klinton Edvan (talk) 08:30, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Singh Agnihotri (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDB and Twitter should not be used as references. Please add ones that cover Rahul in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahul Singh Agnihotri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rahul Singh Agnihotri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Klinton Edvan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:11, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Singh Agnihotri (January 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by David.moreno72 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Youtube not a reliable source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahul Singh Agnihotri and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rahul Singh Agnihotri, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 11:26, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Singh Agnihotri (January 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Stop resubmitting this with no changes.

Praxidicae (talk) 12:51, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Singh Agnihotri (January 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 22:28, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, Klinton Edvan! I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 11:52, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rahul Singh Agnihotri has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rahul Singh Agnihotri. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:40, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Singh Agnihotri (January 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Cameron11598 were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Also appears to be self promotional in nature. And several COI issues. Possible undisclosed paid editing.

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 14:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:43, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]