User talk:Knm3211

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of RUTCOR, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://rutcor.rutgers.edu/about.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 03:51, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand I will revise this page when I have time.

Best, Michael

Lumpability[edit]

Hi Knm3211, welcome to wikipedia and thanks for your recent contributions to the article lumpability. On this occasion I've reverted your additions to the article as successively lumpable processes do not seem particularly notable in the literature. Indeed, searching on Google Scholar gives only one result (the paper you referenced, which is a draft and states "Please do not cite or distribute without permission").

Please familiarise yourself with wikipedia's policies, in particular WP:PROMOTION, WP:IMPORTANCE and WP:CONFLICT. Gareth Jones (talk) 13:53, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

successively lumpable processes  were introduced in the paper I cited which will appear in the next issue of  Probability in the Engr and Information Sciences. 

I will remove the "Please do not cite or distribute without permission".

So you are Michael Katehakis? As a principle contributor to that article you should read Wikipedia:Autobiography. Please don't be discouraged from contributing to Wikipedia, but do familiarise yourself with the kind of contributions that are most welcome here, for which WP:WELCOME is a good start. Thanks. Gareth Jones (talk) 14:33, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am !

I did remove the: "Please do not cite or distribute without permission", from the article.

It is a breakthrough result and it is work including it in wikipedia as soon as possible. Best, Michael

Sure, once the material's published elsewhere (so doesn't violate WP:NOR) feel free to reference it here. Gareth Jones (talk) 15:37, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK ! Thank you Gareth!

October 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Michael Katehakis. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Widefox; talk 08:00, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Knm3211. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Knm3211. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]