User talk:Kratie222

Welcome to Wikipedia and my talk page! click here to leave a new message Kratie222 (talk) 09:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for engaging in disruptive editing; in particular, rapidly reverting non-vandalism edits without explanation, and redirecting valid articles with no explanation. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. BethNaught (talk) 14:53, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Najaf ali bhayo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

McGeddon (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kratie222 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

first of all i am new user nothing more know about wikipedia i only reverted few edits and i was dont know that it is crime on wikipedia and punishment can be block my account. But now my edits are reverted again by admin and admin restored my all edits . i got it reverting can block me Now do justice, kindly give me one chance i will never do this type of mistake in future https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kratie222 link of my contributions

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry accusations aside, this does not address your hoaxing which is the most serious issue here. Max Semenik (talk) 20:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note from blocking admin: please do not unblock until Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Najaf ali bhayo is concluded. This account is a suspected sock puppet. BethNaught (talk) 16:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ISO 639-1:er listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ISO 639-1:er. Since you had some involvement with the ISO 639-1:er redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —teb728 t c 22:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]