User talk:Krellkraver

Hello, Krellkraver! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 02:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your comment on User talk:Abd/IP

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEcommentonp.pdf is a convenience copy of the paper. Eventually, I'll get around to getting that whitelisted, if I don't get blacklisted myself first, so to speak! --Abd (talk) 15:03, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Good find, thanks! I look forward to reading both the for and against in detail. Krellkraver (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

1RR

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Jtbobwaysf (talk) 11:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

I did notice the sanctions that the Bitcoin Cash article is currently under, but I fail to understand why you are posting this particular sanction in my talk page. I am unable to directly edit or revert any content on the Bitcoin Cash article myself right now, so I am only proposing changes, corrections and revisions on the article's Talk page in the hope that an editor that has direct editing ability will take it upon themselves to make the correction/revision as sanctions permit.

You've contended that the news sources I linked as references are not WP:RS, but in this case, the supposedly WP:RS references currently listed in support of the "Bitcoin Cash is also referred to as Bcash" statement only represent attempts by lay-people authors to write authoritatively on an esoteric topic, and subsequently falling woefully short. The news sources I linked, while from less established media outlets, at least focus on the cryptocurrency/distributed ledger technology (DLT) field. Judging solely from the veracity of content, the sources I linked are truly more "reliable" in this particular case. Moreover, the primary sources I linked solely for establishing that actual projects and entities officially claim the "Bcash" name, demonstrate that asserting "Bcash" refers to Bitcoin Cash is simply confusing and false. Krellkraver (talk) 18:11, 24 August 2018 (UTC)