User talk:Ksvaughan2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ksvaughan2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  - CrazyRussian talk/email 05:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Ethnobotany of Wisconsin Indians series[edit]

There is a series authored by Huron H Smith nearly 80 years ago called Ethobotany of Wisconsin Indians series. The volume covering Menomini and Potawatomi are available on-line. Distributed Publishers is currenly working on getting Ojibwa available on-line. There is also one for the HoChunk and one for the Sac & Fox, but I haven't seen them made electronically yet.

Similary in Minnesota, Francis Densmore who collected Dakota and Ojibwa songs have also collected and published ethnobotany information as well. That's all.

CJLippert 19:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chaga mushroom[edit]

Updated DYK query On 10 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chaga mushroom, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Tierra[edit]

Hi. I deleted it because the subject of the article did not meed the notability guidelines - only two sites mentioning him is not enough to assert notability. So, if you are interested in developing the article (with proper references to satisfy notability criterion - noting the popularity of AHG, and his two books, plus showing that the term Planetary Herbology is in widespread use would be a good start), I would say userify the article, i.e., move it from the article namespace into the user namespace (specifically a subpage of your userpage). I am creating the subpage for you to work on - User:Ksvaughan2/Michael Tierra. Develop it here, taking your time. Once fully baked, move it to the proper article name. :) Oh, the category list is commented, uncomment it after moving. Regards, and all the best with the article. --soum (0_o) 03:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and when the article is moved, just let me know if you want the temporary sub-page deleted. :) Regards, --soum (0_o) 03:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Done. :) The article is in a much better shape now. Good luck with it. --soum (0_o) 06:29, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Taxonomy Information[edit]

http://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

http://www.taxonomywarehouse.com/

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?CMD=search&DB=taxonomy

The NCBI Taxonomy Browser looks the best!

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Taxonomy/Browser/wwwtax.cgi?id=285590



WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive[edit]

WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive!

WikiProject Biography is holding a three month long assessment drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unassessed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2007 – September 1, 2007.

Awards to be won range from delicacies such as the WikiCookie to the great Golden Wiki Award.
There are over 110,000 articles to assess so please visit the drive's page and help out!

This drive was conceived of and organized by Psychless with the help of Ozgod. Regards, Psychless Type words!.

Shingles[edit]

Karen I dont know whether you are aware of it but your edits to the shingles article have been reverted by a sly old fox er fish!, in a process of 'slow war' fround upon by Wiki. I am currently outnumbered in a process engineered by same sly old fish! and could use some moral support to reinstate yours and my edits, its a numbers game. If you are still interested, If you read German I could also use your assistance to check a German paper on the use of enzymes in shingles the paper is PMID 7713467 which has an english abstract but no details on the type of trial. There is an English small reveiw of the trial in PMID 16813460 with some details, but the fish keeps reverting it. What I need is someone to confirm the type of trial ie multicenter large scale randomized controlled etc and be prepared to say so in the discussion page when I post the Complementary Therapies section agaain. In the meantime I am looking closely at his referencing and invite you to join in!Jagra 00:43, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have anything on the use of The botanical Glycyrrhizia glabra in shingles as either a topical or otherwise?.I have lots other evidence on it in other conditions but little in shingles? we might put together enough evidence if you can find.Jagra 07:40, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a response for you [1]Jagra

Regarding your comments here, you would be wise to review WP:VANDAL which describes what is vandalism. To quote, "any good faith effort to improve the encyclopedia is not vandalism." Further, accusing someone of being a vandal can be considered a personal attack, and you would be well advised to not continue. With regards to the article, you and Jagra have not employed reliable sources and have promoted fringe theories which lack peer-reviewed sources. In addition, we cannot give undue weight to untested or unsourced information in a scientific or medical article. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to drop me a line on my talk page. Orangemarlin 13:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

International Herb Symposium[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article International Herb Symposium, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

I really think there is some doubt whether all such series are notable; if you think this one is, please add some 3rd party citations to show it.

DGG (talk) 07:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re Things that still need to be done to herbalize Wikipedia (by anyone who knows what they are doing)[edit]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. If you are here with an agenda, it will be very hard to extend WP:AGF to any of your edits. •Jim62sch• 15:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having a project, formal or informal, does not constitute a soapbox, Jim. There are lots of pages filled by amateurs who use secondary sources and poor information. Filling in an area that suffers from lack of information, or correcting misinformation IS a legitimate Wikipedia activity. KSVaughan2 22:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Karen,
I'm interested in expanding stubs for various medicinal herbs. I tried my hand on the Naturopathy page. I made a few small changes, but I sort of lost my head. I need something fun and relatively quiet to work on. If you have a list of priorities I could send you a link once I complete one for you to approve. Previously I have only made a stub for a myrtle, but I have a basic knowledge of Botany, and am a Naturopathy student and a keen gardenerGudzwabofer (talk) 17:43, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Subhuti Dharmananda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Coren (talk) 06:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not advertising. I don't even know the guy but he is important to the history of modern herbalism in America. KSVaughan2 22:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Categories on user page[edit]

You shouldn't have Category:Herbalists on your user page. It's a category for article space only. Categories for Wikipedians have "Wikipedian" in their title. Not sure whether either Category:Wikipedian herbalists exists or not, but it would be the category which should be used... GlassFET 19:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you just want to indicate your interest in the category, mention that you watch this category, but put a full colon between the opening left brackets [[ and the name of the category, thusly: [[:Category:Herbalists]]
and it will display thus:

Category:Herbalists

As GlassFET says, there is currently no Category:Wikipedian herbalists for you to sort yourself into; but you could create one. --Orange Mike 17:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's CONSORTs, and then there's CONSORTs[edit]

The current link on your user page does not link where I suspect you want it to. Take a look at consort for your options; notice the redlink there now. --Orange Mike 20:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Biography Newsletter 5[edit]

To receive this newsletter in the future, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated R Delivery Bot 15:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC) .[reply]

Sorry, I didn't look into it as it was your user page. If I hit edit, I might have been tempted to change it. The way to refer to a category in text is to add a colon before the word category, so [[:Category:Herbalists]] will show up as Category:Herbalists in text. If the colon is not included, then you will see nothing where you thought you were including the category and the page will show up in the category. Hope this helps. Sorry to take so long to reply, but I only get a chance to edit once or twice a week. GlassFET 15:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Alternative Medicine[edit]

You have listed yourself as a participant of this project. The project has had a minimum of activity. Hopefully this can be changed. I am posting this notice on the user talk pages of those participants that are still active Wikipedians. If you are still interested in getting the project into gear, make yourself heard on the project talk page! Cheers! __meco 09:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alteratives[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alteratives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Alteratives. MastCell Talk 19:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By your request, I have posted the deleted article to a sub-page of your user space, User:Ksvaughan2/Alteratives. Please be aware that if you recreate the article without substantial changes, it will probably get speedily deleted as recreation of deleted material. --Aqwis (talkcontributions) 19:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Herbal Administration[edit]

An editor has nominated Herbal Administration, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbal Administration and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 23:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of User:Ksvaughan2/Alteratives[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article User:Ksvaughan2/Alteratives, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on [[Talk:User:Ksvaughan2/Alteratives|its talk page]].

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MastCell Talk 16:12, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ksvaughan2/Alteratives, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ksvaughan2/Alteratives and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ksvaughan2/Alteratives during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MastCell Talk 20:52, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - regarding the deleted alteratives page, I can restore it for you if you like, but... it was deleted because Wikipedia doesn't store material indefinitely if it doesn't meet the site's policies for inclusions. I'll happily restore it as long as you're ready to work on it. You can just respond here and let me know. MastCell Talk 21:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am willing to work on it, so I would appreciate your restoring it and letting me know where it is.

KSVaughan2 (talk) 12:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Acupuncture Association of America[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Acupuncture Association of America, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Unusual? Quite TalkQu 20:03, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Jianpi Wan[edit]

Hi Karen, As you are a member of the WikiProject Alternative medicine, i would appreciate your views on the proposed deletion of Jianpi Wan at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jianpi_Wan

Jianpi Wan is an ancient Chinese herbal formula to strengthen the spleen. The formula has been published in a number of books, with the ingredient names in either English/Latin or Chinese, but not both. Now this article makes the formula available in both languages, so that a deeper understanding can be achieved. (talk) 07:57, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Henriette-kress1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [2], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

  • state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
  • add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ViperSnake151  Talk  17:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible edit war at Keewaydinoquay Peschel[edit]

Aaniin Ksvaughan2. The article you have started have grown some since your creation of it. However, it seems it may be going through an edit war. If you wouldn't mind, would you take a look at it, review the article history and the comments associated with it, and see if you could adequately address the concerns there with appropriate edits? Miigwech. CJLippert (talk) 23:08, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Zhangzhong.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Zhangzhong.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted![edit]

Science lovers wanted!
Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Smithsonian Institution Archives until June! One of my goals as resident, is to work with Wikipedians and staff to improve content on Wikipedia about people who have collections held in the Archives - most of these are scientists who held roles within the Smithsonian and/or federal government. I thought you might like to participate since you are interested in the sciences! Sign up to participate here and dive into articles needing expansion and creation on our to-do list. Feel free to make a request for images or materials at the request page, and of course, if you share your successes at the outcomes page you will receive the SIA barnstar! Thanks for your interest, and I look forward to your participation! Sarah (talk) 00:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)|}[reply]

Nomination of Michael Tierra for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Tierra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Tierra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 03:50, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Herbalists Guild for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Herbalists Guild is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Herbalists Guild until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CorporateM (Talk) 07:29, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amanda McQuade Crawford for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amanda McQuade Crawford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amanda McQuade Crawford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 02:42, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Winston for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Winston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Winston until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 02:47, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Subhuti Dharmananda for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subhuti Dharmananda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subhuti Dharmananda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Delta13C (talk) 02:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Pacific College of Oriental Medicine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Small, private education provider does not fulfill notability guidelines for notability (organizations and companies)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been pruned from a list[edit]

Hi Ksvaughan2! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]