User talk:Kupraios

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Korres.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rushbugled13 (talk) 04:48, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Korres concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Korres, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically List of Prime Ministers of Greece, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 20:08, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do not re-add those files or I will be forced to escalate the issue, that may result in you being blocked or topic banned. Werieth (talk) 20:14, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond on your talk page and stop undoing my edits until we have reached an agreement. Kupraios (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually per WP:NFCC the files need to remain removed until agreement is reached. If you add them again you will be blocked for repeated violations of NFCC and edit warring. Werieth (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't add, I removed. Just for your information, I am able to change my IP and create a new account - about a 10 minute job, so the threats won't discourage me from fighting against the Wikipedia bureaucrats. Kupraios (talk) 02:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Xanthi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 00:14, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As an added note, the difference between London's minorities and Xanthi's is that Xanthi's minorities are indigenous to the area. The did not immigrate there as they did in London. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 00:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then what about New York City? There peoples from various nations at the time of its founding. Also, there were no Turks/Bulgarians in Xanthi in 879 BC (its earliest known date of existance), so why you have chosen an arbitrarily recent year to determine who is indigenous is illogical. Kupraios (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Balkan-related articles warning[edit]

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 01:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kupraios, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 02:45, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't wait to see the proof.

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Xanthi. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 03:18, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then do not provoke such attacks. Kupraios (talk) 03:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a fortnight for abusing multiple accounts, as

Confirmed by checkuser at SPI. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 11:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Korres[edit]

Hello Kupraios. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Korres".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Korres}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]