User talk:Kurigo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi Kurigo! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Renat (talk) 06:19, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are You a bot? I would help if you are not a damn bot. -- Kurigo (talk) 11:02, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I am not a bot.--Renat (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Thank you for the welcoming message. I wonder what contribution did I make that made you message me in this talk page? Just curious. Maybe I can add more info. --Kurigo (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Balance[edit]

Hi, I was impressed by your response to my post on the help desk. I cannot emphasise enough how important your studies are. In my opinion (I am aged 60), completing your assignments to the very best of your ability is utterly fundamental to the whole of your future working life. I managed to mess up the whole of my schooling and university education, with the result that I had a whole load of low-paid jobs until I was 25. Then I went back to college (thanks to my local education authority in the UK) and studied something completely different; that time I did considerably better, and by the time I was around 30 I had landed a job (strangely not directly connected with my second time in college) which eventually took me as an IT hardware instructor all over the world.

There are so many distractions (online and off) to divert you from your primary reason for being at college: namely, to better yourself (or more simply: just to do better). Unless you are very lucky, being at college, here, now, is your only chance to distinguish yourself from millions of other (either less or more fortunate) people. I urge you to grasp this chance with both hands, and to make the very best of it that you possibly can. Throw yourself into your studies, engage personally with your lecturers (NB they may seem to be assholes); and ask them, "What does this really mean?" "How can I do better?" The best of them will show you exactly how to do it, if you are willing to learn: and it will be a joint achievement, full of joy and happiness. MinorProphet (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I've got to be honest, those are inspiring. I mean, I learned something great from you. I now know that studying is more important than wikipedia. Thanks for answering and even taking the time to type all of this. I am truly amazed. I will apply your idea in my life and do guide myself in this. Thank you soo much!!!--Kurigo (talk) 00:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurigo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. Why am I blocked in English Wikipedia? Now I cant talk with other users. Please notify and consider my request. I plainly did nothing wrong. Kurigo (talk) 07:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked because the checkuser tool indicates you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 12:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurigo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

PhilKnight indicated that I have been using many accounts when I dont have any idea of the others nor I have created one. If there is or are, No i did not create those. This is my only sole account that I am using. Kurigo. Nothing else. I dont have any connections with any of those sockpuppet account. Please rectify. Kurigo (talk) 15:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Also WP:NONAZIS. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 18:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurigo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

No. I am not a Nazi. I dont propagate nazi views on wiki. Please check again. I am not the one who created those sentiments. Also, please shorten my block limit if I can't do anything about this. It would help me a lot to edit in the future. Thanks Kurigo (talk) 09:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQLQuery me! 01:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurigo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Renewing my request for unblock. Although I won't accept that I did whatever happened before, I hereby request an unblock from the moderators. My placement here in this Wikipedia is not disruptive anymore. I would like to continue to contribute in different articles with little or no sources. I understood what happened and I promise it won't happen again. Kurigo (talk) 12:58 am, 26 March 2021, last Friday (6 days ago) (UTC−7)

Decline reason:

I think it would help if you actually read the reasons why your previous unblock requests were declined. "I understood what happened" is not an explanation or an acknowledgement that you misused multiple accounts or support war crimes. Please know that you don't have an unlimited number of unblock requests. As SQL recommends, read guide to appealing blocks before you file another unblock request because you have four failed unblock requests and are clearly not understanding what is called for in a request. Again, read the reasons why your previous requests were declined. You say you're a student, learn from your unsuccessful attempts. Liz Read! Talk! 04:32, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kurigo (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I request an unblock and I am appealing to the administrators of Wikipedia. It seems the bad deed done was made last year and the intrusive editing was removed already. I hope you can understand my situation that I am no longer a threat to Wikipedia and its policies. You can even check my edits before being banned that none are harmful or misleading. I have been editing another Wikipedia language edition and since then, I have added a lot of information to which is useful for the readers. I made it thrive rather than destroying/vandalizing it. Until now, I am still adding and rehearsing some info coming from ENglish Wikipedia to my Home wikipedia. I request an unblock since some features are hard to bring and implement there. You may check my profile to know that what I am saying is true. I requested before a short time/duration of block however it was denied for some unknown reason. I hope the reader of this message can be compassionate about my plight to develop other Wikipedia editions not just in English Wiki. I promise to even uphold every rule here as well as in my home wikipedia. Thank you and good day :) Kurigo (talk) 08:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This was confirmed by a checkuser as the sock of a blocked account. Not suspected, confirmed. Without giving away much, the IP address is not the only tool at the discrection of checkusers. At this point I am also removing talk page access, because the below comment that was linked truly has no place on Wikipedia. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:40, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin: We'll still need some explanation regarding the actions of this editor's sock accounts, in particular User:ProWarCrime, who posted: I am in favor of crimes committed by the Nazis. I call it 'population control'. Don't worry. I dont troll wikipedia articles nor mix my radicalization within it. I am a student and I just think there are people who should cease to exist at that time (1940s). The passivity of this request ("the bad deed was done") essentially denies responsibility for filth like this. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 17:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May I clarify that this account or user is not within my control nor do I have any connection. The IP address was targeted and checkuser range blocked my past IP which unfortunately my account is connected. Smart Connections (Company) changes frequently the IP designation per user and somehow landed with this IP. Per IP holds at least half a city if I am correct which holds about 1,000-10,000 people. Even the IP I am even assigned now is considered a "proxy" with indefinite ban in Wikipedia with no account creation, which is something out of my control. The broadband/Wifi connection recycles IP since towers here are very limited. I even tried to contact Smart concerning this faulty IP connection. The same goes with User:Shearts which again I have no total control and I don't even know what it did.
I request again if my unblock request is again denied, please allow this account to be temporarily banned with shortened time from its current status of permanent. A lot features are missed from me being banned in a meta-wiki edition. My main concern is not editing in English Wiki edition anymore, but improving my home Wikipedia via Translation and regulations. If you want to see my credibiltity, see my edits here: https://tl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natatangi:Mga_ambag/Kurigo . Again, Thank you for your consideration and pardon me for any mistakes commited. Good day :)--Kurigo (talk) 03:38, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]