User talk:LIbby.Hoban

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clyde Space (September 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MassiveYR was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MassiveYR 16:18, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, LIbby.Hoban! I'm LIbby.Hoban. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. LIbby.Hoban (talk) 15:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC) Hi LIbby.Hoban (talk)Worldbruce[reply]

I never deleted anything, at least not intentionally. Are you able to provide feedback on how best to proceed?

Many thanks, --LIbby.Hoban (talk) 15:02, 3 November 2017 (UTC) LIbby.Hoban[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clyde Space (November 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kiteinthewind was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 01:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! LIbby.Hoban, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 01:28, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Hi there, I noticed your post at WP:Teahouse and took a look at Draft:Clyde Space which looks very good. In a nutshell you need a couple more solid references. Newspapers and books are the best, things like industry publications are usually ignored, see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. The section on "Sources" will not count at all as they aren't connected as a reference to any claim in the text. The following lines would be great for notability only if they have the benefit of a "reliable source":

The company operates internationally

The company designed and built Scotland’s first satellite

Sunday Times award for Innovation

They announced the creation of a US company, Clyde Space, Inc

Clyde Space have been busy for over a decade racking up space mission heritage

On the other side of the coin the only reliably sourced reference is the BBC article "Scottish space industry soaring high". Unfortunately that great source only backs up "In the last two years, Glasgow has built more satellites than any other city in Europe". It would be great to use this reference for "Clyde Space quickly came to dominate the market in providing components for the CubeSats." and "The UK Space Agency then commissioned Clyde Space to build what was Scotland's first satellite."

I hope this helps, good luck with your article! Dougmcdonell (talk) 05:14, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 18:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]