User talk:Ladaherra

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladaherra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello. I think that it is unfair that Ymblanter blocked me for reverting reverts of my edits. I didn't vandalise Wikipedia at all. I didn't add profanity or something explicit. I did two edits which got reverted. On the Vladimir Putin article eventually my revert got accepted so It will be not included. So I was pretty much blocked for nothing. The weird thing is that all of my edits were reverted on articles about Russia. It feels like Ymblanter is taking this personally because he does not like that I edit articles about Russia in a positive way. There are people on Wikipedia who destroy pages and write profanity but they get a block of only 2 weeks or something near that. I got indefinite. For what? Ladaherra (talk) 12:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

First off indefinite does not mean forever. It means without a defined duration. Secondly you were given ample warning to stop edit warring. Your response was "You can't threat to block me if you don't have a good basis to say that". Well it turn out that there was a good basis to say that. You were warned to stop edit warring or you could be blocked. You did not stop and you got blocked. If you want to be unblocked you need to convince an admin that the problem will not continue, your current request seems to dodge responsibility and instead blame our admin for just doing their job. HighInBC 17:37, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request 2[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladaherra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I can assure you that I will not cause problems to the Wikipedia community anymore. I'm sorry for my mistakes. Here are the diffs of the revertions which got me blocked for an indefinite time: [1],[2],[3],[4] judge by yourself if you see it necessary to keep the block up. I also assure that I will not keep the battleground mentality up. Ladaherra (talk) 18:17, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It was the reversions without discussion that got you blocked. In this context, the block should remain until you understand why you were blocked, and grasp how to edit constructively. PhilKnight (talk) 03:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request 3[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladaherra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It has been a week since my block. I have understood the reason why I got blocked. I will edit constructively. I'm sorry for my mistakes. Ladaherra (talk) 6:25 pm, 27 April 2016, last Wednesday (2 days ago) (UTC+2)

Decline reason:

I reviewed every single edit of yours, and it is clear to me that you are WP:NOTHERE. You were edit-warring, you were displaying strong WP:BATTLEGROUND mentality, you were even reveling the real name of another user. It is not enough just to say "I understand the reason I got blocked". You have to show us that you really understand it by explaining what you've done wrong. You also have to tell us how you intend to change your behavior. But, again, it is not enough just to say "I will change". You have to tell us exactly what kind behavior you intend to change and how. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:16, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request 4[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ladaherra (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is the 4th time I'm making an unblock request. I was blocked on 19th of April for edit warring. I completely understand the reason why I got blocked. I broke the three revert rule and releaved a personal name of a user which I thought to be public here by his will. The first thing I will do that I will learn to use the talk page always in tricky situations. And I will try to keep my edits on the articles by talking on the talk page instead of edit warring. I will try to prevent every problematic situation from escalating. And I will also try to keep myself from not losing my temper. I will also start editing more articles about the things I know so I can be more constructive by making new articles etc. Ladaherra (talk) 20:32, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You say you get why you were blocked but you were not blocked for edit warring. You don't get unlimited unblock requests. I think your block has already been sufficiently reviewed. If you want further review you can user WP:UTRS. HighInBC 03:31, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.