User talk:Lagringa

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from RichardWeiss! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:

Again, welcome SqueakBox 21:58, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!!![edit]

Hello Lagringa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 15:49, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

As a new user, noone expects you to be familiar with all the Wikipedia policies right away. However, Wikipedia:Three-revert rule is one that you need to read and become familiar with early on as violations of it are generally considered very seriously (there is even an express lane for reporting such violations). As you've violated it in the Affirmative action article, I recommend that you correct this problem as soon as you can.-Psychohistorian 12:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have basis and verifiable facts for the orginal articles seen on Sept 10 on David Cunningham's biography? The content is not objective material. When I try to make it objective, it seems to disappear. Can we work something out?Keiko234 02:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chabot Copyright Violation[edit]

The article copied on the Anthony Chabot page is in the public domain. It was published in 1883 and the website explicitly says all materials are in the public domain. Is it OK to remove the copyright violation tag? Lagringa 01:37, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not a copyvio expert but:
  1. http://www.calarchives4u.com/index.htm says "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED" at the bottom.
  2. The article has already been deleted once as a copyvio.
But you might be right that it's in the public domain. Regardless it should be modified to be in encyclopedic tone. You're welcome to do that at Talk:Anthony Chabot/Temp while the copyvio is in limbo. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It says all materials are in the public domain on the front page http://www.calarchives4u.com/. I will do some work on improving the writing. Lagringa 02:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

West Oakland "Japantown"[edit]

Thanks for the reference; I had no knowledge of this previously.

The article you cited also refers to another Bay Area outrage against Japanese citizens that I did know about, the use of the then Tanforan racetrack as a holding area, where they were kept in horse stalls. Seems the bad karma from this has lingered over the decades; the latest incarnation of the shopping center there isn't doing too well from what I hear. +ILike2BeAnonymous 19:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Affirmative action[edit]

If, as currently appears to be the case, User:Psychohistorian insists on me starting an RFC on his conduct instead of accepting mediation, will you be willing to join me in that? To start an RFC requires that at least two parties say that they have tried and failed to work out the problem with the person. - Jmabel | Talk 02:33, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

California Gold Rush article[edit]

Thanks for your earlier peer review comments about that California Gold Rush article, which were very helpful! If you do have a moment, and could take another look at the article that would be appreciated. There have been a number of useful comments, which have been taken into account, and your further thoughts would be appreciated. Also, if there's a chance that you think that this article might be nominated for Good Article status, and might be able to make that nomination, that would be very much appreciated as well! NorCalHistory 16:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization in dictionary entries?[edit]

I noticed you have capitalized the entries on a number of pages. This looks strange to me, as I have never seen a dictionary with capitalized entries. It makes it difficult to distinguish between proper names and ordinary words. You say it's a "general convention" - what does that mean? That's not how it's done in Wikidictionary, for one. Lagringa 01:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. That was a mistake, which some one pointed out to me while I was doing those edits. I had even offerred to re-do the same. However, perhaps I was made to understand that that was not very urgent. Still, I would reverse the same some day. Regards. --Bhadani 13:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of English words of Romanian origin[edit]

I'm not quite sure what you mean. Firstly, there is no deletion notice on the article, and secondly I've re-added pastrami because the article of the same name states the word is from the language, and Online Etymology Dictionary thinks so too. An unsupported theory (the "definitely not Romanian" one) which contradicts another article in this encyclopaedia is probably not worth going by. -- the GREAT Gavini 15:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request[edit]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:59, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FA nomination for California Gold Rush[edit]

The California Gold Rush article has been nominated for Featured article status. If you would like to comment on this nomination, please go here to leave your comment. To leave a comment on that page, click the [edit] link to the right of the title California Gold Rush.NorCalHistory 20:41, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your assistance during the peer review of this article; that assistance was material in helpful this article achieve its FA status - thank you! NorCalHistory 15:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

¡Saludos![edit]

Acabo de leer la discussion page del artículo referido a la cocina de Argentina y me ha llamado la atención que apareciera la firma Lagringa. En Argentina suele llamarsele "gringa" (con mucho cariño ) a la mujer de origen italiano, es así que muchas argentinas se autodenominan o apodan La Gringa ¿por casualidad tendrás algún origen argentino?.
Sea como sea, van mis mejores saludos hacia Vos (hacia tí).
José 06:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

Invitation[edit]

Hello – Based on your significant contribution to one or more San Francisco Bay Area-related articles and/or stated interests on your homepage, I thought you might be interested in this project:

You have been invited to join the WikiProject San Francisco Bay Area, a collaborative effort focused on improving Wikipedia's coverage of the Bay Area. If you'd like to join, just add your name to the member list. Thanks for reading!

Peter G Werner 21:01, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lagringa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of the Name California[edit]

@Lagringa: In September, 2006, you said you were working on a major rewrite of the Origin of the name California article. I assume it is something you were not able to get around to, but I recently did a major cleanup, reorg and rewrite of the article. I am also working on developing some additional content for the article. If you have any materials that might be helpful, or any suggestions for improving the article, I would be glad to have your input. Thak you. OvertAnalyzer (talk) 15:53, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freecycling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freecycle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lagringa&oldid=1143127010"