User talk:LakshayYadav007

June 2022[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to 2020 Delhi Legislative Assembly election, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please explain your reason for changing the images. Venkat TL (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Venkat TL. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Telugu Desam Party, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Telangana Rashtra Samithi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 17:25, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Samajwadi Party, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 17:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Next Bihar Legislative Assembly election. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Venkat TL (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Next Bihar Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. Venkat TL (talk) 18:36, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Communist_Party_of_India. Zsohl ^(Talk) 17:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Indian National Congress. Venkat TL (talk) 13:57, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 14:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chinese Communist Party. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Wham2001 (talk) 09:02, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2011 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election, you may be blocked from editing. Aoidh (talk) 19:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhabanipur Assembly constituency. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Samata Party is not left wing party[edit]

Dear sir, Samata Party is not left wing party, it center right wing. It spilt from Janata Dal and allinanced with NDA from 1996 to 2003. Founder Ex Defence Minister of India George Fenrnandis

Please make it correct Qakbotmankr1995 (talk) 15:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a socialist party. Socialism is a Left-wing ideology. Doesn’t matter if it allied with NDA.

Shiv Sena allied with UPA still it is considered a Right-wing party. LakshayYadav007 (talk) 12:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Although your edit says it is left wing? Doug Weller talk 10:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Teri maa ki chut lund lele mera LakshayYadav007 (talk) 11:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Angrez log jyada tej banta hai lodu LakshayYadav007 (talk) 11:26, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 09:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Number 57 with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making edits like this. The infobox automatically sizes both photos to 150x150. The problem is with your browser, not the code. I see both images equally sized before you added that, but afterwards they are different.

Also, it doesn't matter where you come from, you have no more right that I do to edit Indian election articles. Number 5 7 11:57, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you've continued with the personal attacks and unhelpful editing, I have started a discussion on your behaviour at ANI, which you can see here. Number 5 7 12:12, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Additionally stop making gatekeeping claims that people cannot edit certain pages because they're not of a particular ethnicity or nationality. Canterbury Tail talk 12:30, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LakshayYadav007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had problems in my browser therefore I thought there was a image size problem so I edited the size of the images, being a very new user I was unaware. I got frustrated thinking why my edits were being reverted so I behaved rudely. Sorry, It won’t happen again.

Decline reason:

You can sit this one out. You're lucky it's a temporary block; I would have sent you away indefinitely for "You’re not an Indian so pls kindly fuck off" and "Apni maa mat chudao". --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:06, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I must admit I was tempted, but I think they could possibly be a productive user if they get their severe conduct issues under control. And if they don’t, then the button is right there. Canterbury Tail talk 16:25, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Atharv Bakshi per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atharv Bakshi. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:41, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity - I do not know for sure whether you are connected to the Atharv Bakshi account, but I do know that you were editing as RohanSingh948, evading the block on this account. Girth Summit _(blether) 09:43, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]