User talk:Landihan/Archive 1

April 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A piece of advice; never put personally identifying information (such as an email address) in the open web, unless you want crawlers to pick it up and start spamming you. If you have any questions about how Wikipedia works, please ask at the Tea House. -- Alexf^(talk) 10:19, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Landihan, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Landihan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Twinkle[edit]

Hi Landihan, you may already be aware but Twinkle is a gadget you can enable in your preferences that makes certain tasks easier, such as reverting vandalism, leaving notices and/or Welcome messages on talk pages along with many other tasks. You may find it quite useful. :) S0091 (talk) 16:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice, as of the 26th of April I am not autoconfirmed. Twinkle is available for autoconfirmed users (I'm pretty sure.?) The moment I am Autoconfirmed I will definitly make use of Twinkle. Thanks again, --Landihan (talk) 17:03, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Landihan! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Spam draft (promotion), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn[edit]

Hi! I also recently started editing this month, however I have some gripes with Twinkle which I have tried to solve in my new tool called RedWarn.

The RedWarn project was built with the aims to:
1. Make moderating Wikipedia more accessible in order to minimise the amount of vandalism or disruptive editing on the platform
2. Simplify many processes while also providing previews and descriptions in order to reduce errors
3. Make reverting edits as fast as possible without the need of any additional software

I am currently looking for editors who would be willing to test it. If you are interested, let me know by either using the "Reply to" template or leaving a message on my talk page. I'd really appreaciate it. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a message on your talk page. (thanks for thanking me regarding my recent anti-vandalism edit)--Landihan (talk) 20:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn - important info to get back up and running[edit]

Hey! Thanks for testing RedWarn. This is an important message to notify you that effective immediately, you need to change your common.js. This is due to my usurp request to change my username from an alias, JamesHSmith6789, to a more identifiable one, Ed6767 being accepted.

To do this, edit your config.js and remove the existing RedWarn script line and replace it with this one:

importScript("User:Ed6767/redwarn.js");

Click here to edit your common.js

And, here's another reminder to please, please, leave feedback and report all bugs on the talk page. By reporting bugs, you can help get them fixed by the next daily release.

Also, if you're interested in live discussion regarding the development and help with using RedWarn, why not join our new Discord server. It's easy to sign up and you can get help and chat with other RedWarn users.

Again, thank you so much for being willing to beta test RedWarn! I really appreciate it. Ed6767 (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A message from Ed6767 about RedWarn[edit]

Hello RedWarn tester! I hate to reitterate, but thank you so much for being willing to test RedWarn, I really appreciate it.

In the past few updates, I have added AIV (admin) reporting, a preferences panel, themes, customisation options and made many, many bug fixes and added many features based on your suggestions and feedback.

Unfortunately, recently feedback has run dry.

Even if you do not use RedWarn at the moment, or you do (tysm), I would greatly appreciate feedback of any kind. While I go round Twinkle users, sounding like that broadband salesperson in the mall that nobody ever wants to speak to, I'd like some updated feedback from recent and current users.

Any sort of feedback below would be greately appreciated!

Your first impressions when you tried RedWarn?
How have you used RedWarn as time has gone on?
Would you value customisation features, such as macros or shortcuts, such as adding your own quick revert reasons so the tool can fit your exact editing practices?
Any suggestions for how I could promote the tool to a wider audience?
Would you appreciate a more developed and thorough user guide?
Any theme suggestions?
Anything you'd like changing?
Something you've always wanted to see in an anti-vandal tool? (I might add it!)
RedWarn app?
A way to introduce Recent Changes patrol to new users to make using RedWarn or other tools less daunting?
Any bugs, gripes, or things that just really annoy you about RedWarn?

Click the button below to begin a new section on the talk page

Leave Feedback

My goal is to create the most user friendly moderation tool, and that's why I need your feedback to help make this truely the most favorable anti-vandal tool. While we will never elliminate vandalism on this site, we can get closer to fighting it quickly and easily.

Many thanks for your continued support. Ed6767 (talk) 00:23, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not wish to get these feedback reminders, let me know on my talk page. Love the sunshine theme btw.

"Your Edit Was Removed"[edit]

A moderator bot claimed that my edit in Leela Chess Zero was a test and removed my edit, yet it didn't actually revert my edit. It was not a test edit and it was intended to remove unnecessary content.

Thanks for contacting me. I have removed the warning on your talk page. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia :) --Landihan (talk) 10:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Special Barnstar
	You have made many contributions. Thank you and good job! Oneillge2029 (talk) 19:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

falling in love article[edit]

i dont use wikipedia so it would be helpful if you could rewrite the 'spiritual value' section, by providing a proper link relating to the dissolution of ego boundaries (as this differes from the concept of personal boundaries) and adding more important details and sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.109.73.97 (talk) 19:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@88.109.73.97, I'm not an expert in the area either but I have removed the warning I placed on your account as you know more about the subject than me. Please continue to contribute to Wikipedia just be sure to know the guidelines. Thanks for leaving an edit summary last time but remember everyone may not understand the context.--Landihan (talk) 19:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for allowing the contribution, a sign of humility on your side.

A barnstar for you![edit]

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for all your hard work on fighting vandalism! PinkSpecledHen (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aquakultre (May 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Celestina007 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Non notable musician who seems to be notable for only one event.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aquakultre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aquakultre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Celestina007 (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Srinivaspur page[edit]

Sorry I did not mention the reason for editing the entry for Srinivaspur. I have now explained the reason, and edited the page again. This edit was long overdue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.35.218.171 (talk) 15:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for providing reason. I have removed the warning on your account and will ensure your latest edit does not get removed :)--Landihan (talk) 15:43, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Anarchyte (talk • work) 16:49, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RedWarn - Quick Survey[edit]

Hello Landihan! Thank you so much for testing RedWarn so far. I kindly ask that you fill in a short survey regarding the future of RedWarn and to help me visualise general user opinion surrounding certain features.

To access the survey, visit: https://devices.edxt.net/redwarnSurvey

Thank you again for your continued feedback and support, it is greatly appreciated. Ed6767 talk! 22:15, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to opt-out of receiving messages regarding RedWarn, or have any questions, please let me know on my talk page.