User talk:LarryEdmister

July 2019

Hello, I'm Railfan23. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to LGBT rights in the United States seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 00:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Changed Movement (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Changed Movement and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The Changed Movement, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello, LarryEdmister! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:51, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Draft:The Changed Movement concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Changed Movement, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Changed Movement

Hello, LarryEdmister. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Changed Movement".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Conspiracy theory synthesis

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at ID2020‎, you may be blocked from editing. Kuru (talk) 14:57, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Kuru, They're still at it: [1]. David O. Johnson (talk) 21:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

I have provided two reputable sources as is clearly visible. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding research for a permanent record that would be needled onto a person's arm and able to be scanned by a modified smart phone. This is important because the current edit is slightly inaccurate when it says that the Bill Gates and his foundation have been falsely accused. The articles quoted are MIT and the BBC. MIT is self reporting the research being done at their own institution and the BBC article is written by Lina Zeldovich where she quotes the research and the BBC stands by her investigative journalism.

Far less researched articles are being allowed to remain

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is funding Microneedle drug delivery research at MIT.. This research is being considered as a means to create 'on-patient' vaccine records that could be scanned at places like ports of entry.

This has no direct correlation to the conspiracy theory. Again, please read Wikipedia:SYNTHESIS. It does not matter if you've provided sources that some related topic exists. If you add this material again to an article noting that people have been receiving death threats about a conspiracy theory, and attempt to justify those threats, I will block this account. Kuru (talk) 03:34, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

This has an absolute correlation, the conspiracy theory is that Gates is funding on person, tractable medical record systems, which is true, if you block this relevant information, you are denying the public important information. Death threats against ID2020 staff does not negate the publicly recorded work of the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation being funding and conducted at MIT.

July 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:36, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Warning: Further edit warring in this topic area will lead to a topic ban from COVID-19 and related topics without further warning. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 07:38, 22 July 2020 (UTC)