User talk:Lausianne

Whether I am anonymous or not, does not affect the validity of the removal of your spam.

Priacta[edit]

I'm sorry, but the website you're adding offers a service and therefore cannot be used. Although the IP is wrong to continuously revert you, the website is considered spam by our policies. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 07:08, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay, I see what you're trying to cite. Hmm, not sure about this one, but I'm going to leave it in for now. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 07:10, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. Let me know if the three-revert rule is broken (3 reverts in 24 hours). PeterSymonds (talk) 08:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've blocked the IP for 3RR. Please do not revert in the time period, but ask an editor you're familiar with (Jeremy McCracken or someone) to do it for you. Thanks, PeterSymonds (talk) 08:25, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I readded the citation. I'm not sure about what the site sells, but the page lists software programs to back up a statement in the article, so it should be acceptable. A list on a non-commercial site would be ideal, but this one is definitely better than a {{fact}} tag. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:40, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, hehe. Added back in. :) Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: PeterSymonds's user talk[edit]

Just so you know, i've filed an WP:RPP for Getting Things Done which you discussed at User talk:PeterSymonds. StewieGriffin! • Talk Sign 15:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]