User talk:Lawrencegordon
August 2021[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Adolf Hitler. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357 Talk 20:21, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Hyacinth Graf Strachwitz[edit]
In your no-consensus page moves, you changed the title of the Röll reference to your preferred spelling from the actual title of the boom - see [1]. That is at best extremely sloppy and lazy behaviour. As this is clearly not a non-controversial move, then it should go via the WP:RM process to actually get some consensus - and note that on the article talk page that questions have been raised about the reliability of Bogdanis - please revert your changes and get consensus.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- And you continue to alter the title of books and articles -[2] - this is falsification of sources.Nigel Ish (talk) 15:23, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |