User talk:Leemac71

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: IKozie micro-home has been accepted[edit]

IKozie micro-home, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Lopifalko (talk) 16:08, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

Hello AuventPR. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AuventPR. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AuventPR|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Peacock (talk) 11:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Answer to Pcock[edit]

Hello Pcock

Thanks for the message. You are correct in that I am being paid and I wanted to declare it as per the wiki rules - but this is the most confusing CMS system/set of rules I have ever come across. If I knew where to post the information I would. So, even after reading your message, while I know what I need to do, where it goes, how it is done is not that simple for a new user. Even when you out links, it takes you away from the page you are on, rather than opening in a new window.

Assistance is welcome to get this sorted out - in an efficient and easy manner. AuventPR (talk) 12:25, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When reading this message, you should see a tab "User page". Click on that tab. In the box that opens place this text "{{paid|user=AuventPR|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}" (replacing with your relevant information), then click the button that says "Publish page". I hope this helps. Peacock (talk) 12:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have achieved this! Thanks for your assistance. I have also added a summary, so hopefully this information assists future posts too. AuventPR (talk) 12:36, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I notice the page has been flagged - hopefully, now that I have acknowledged the payment, this will be removed as I am in no way looking to violate any terms. AuventPR (talk) 12:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is the photo that was flagged, for a copyright violation. I have removed that flag as someone mistakenly assumed it came from the Daily Mail, but instead it is the Daily Mail that got the photo from the same source as yourself. The photo says "Source: Own work" but it would appear your are not the source but "The Homeless Foundation / SWNS". You could correct that. -Lopifalko (talk) 13:00, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The photo was sent to me via a dropbox from Kieran O'Donell, director of iKozie. Hence 'own work' and no copyright infringement. I am not aware of any other source to attribute it too - and SWNS may well have the image from Kieran as well - and ensured they were credited when distributing the original release. This went worldwide, so the images, are likely to be used frequently. AuventPR (talk) 13:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is not your own work then, but that of Kieran O'Donell. You need to demonstrate that it has been made available to Wikipedia under a free license. -Lopifalko (talk) 13:20, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
How is this done?
Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission -Lopifalko (talk) 14:35, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. DlohCierekim 13:22, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Information icon

Hello AuventPR. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AuventPR. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AuventPR|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DlohCierekim 13:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who you are but this matter has been dealt with. This constant barrage is unacceptable. AuventPR (talk) 13:27, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You still need to change your username. . DlohCierekim 13:54, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get what is wrong with the username?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Leemac71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this is just the name I have for my business. The business consists of me and only me. So it is not a website or an organisation or a group. AuventPR (talk) 13:59, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Usernames are not allowed on Wikipedia if they: only contain the names of companies, organizations, websites, musical groups or bands, teams, social media or streaming channels, or creative groups are promotional in nature, or appear to advertise, promote, sell, or gain support or user base of any person, company, market, product, channel, or other good or service imply that your user account will be shared between more than one person only describe a role, title, or position within an organization that can be represented or held by different people" -- WP:USERNAME. You need to pick a new username. Yamla (talk) 14:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Leemac71 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

change to Leemac71 AuventPR (talk) 14:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I have changed your username, since that was the only reason for the block, I will lift it. Please continue to comply with WP:COI. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Homeless Foundation (Charity) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Homeless Foundation (Charity). Thanks! — Stevey7788 (talk) 23:16, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Homeless Foundation (Charity) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Homeless Foundation (Charity). Thanks! — Stevey7788 (talk) 23:17, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Homeless Foundation (Charity) (March 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:
Self-published sources and other Wikipedia articles don't count as acceptable references for demonstrating notability. See also WP:SIGCOV.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Stevey7788 (talk) 23:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Leemac71! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Stevey7788 (talk) 23:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Homeless Foundation has been accepted[edit]

The Homeless Foundation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MartinPoulter (talk) 19:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Leemac71&oldid=1145655679"