User talk:Lenilucho

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. dcandeto 22:04, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand why my article was deleted. Can you explain that to me?--Lenilucho 17:28, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:FRSM57.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FRSM57.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 10:28, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Sm57.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sm57.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 23:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opel Zafira[edit]

Hello Lenilucho,

Thanks for your contribution to the Opel Zafira article. I just wanted to make sure whether the 2nd-gen Space Wagon had "stowaway" third seat row (two individual seats that folded flat into the floor) - I've never been too familiar with this model. I believe this is a picture of the interior of this car [1] - the seats appear to be removable, like in the 3rd-gen, and not foldable into the floor.

I see that you are from Uruguay. I think that the guys over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Automobiles (including myself in particular) would appreciate your contributions as concerns vehicles available in South America, if you would have time to devote to that!

Regards,

Bravada Talk to me! 20:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm 100% sure, my father had one some years ago. At least the model that was sold in Uruguay, the seats would fold in a similar way to Zafira. The model that was sold here was made in Japan. We didn't have a digital camera at that time, so I don't have any pictures.--Lenilucho 08:30, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Third person[edit]

Regarding Balanced line, note that the Manual of Style recommends against using second person in articles. — Omegatron 18:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nokia 6131 - left.JPG[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Nokia 6131 - left.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Nokia 6131 - right.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Nokia 6131 - right.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:01, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Dbx.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dbx.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:AEE-screenshot-big.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:AEE-screenshot-big.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lenilucho. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ThinkSystem moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to ThinkSystem. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ThinkSystem[edit]

Hello, Lenilucho. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ThinkSystem, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:ThinkSystem[edit]

Hello, Lenilucho. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ThinkSystem".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]