User talk:Lettik

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Lettik. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Automatic Strikeout (T • C) 18:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(Moved to talk)[edit]

Hi,

I do not know of you are a LDS or not but you are article has got some misunderstanding which I have been trying to correct but you seem you do not want to give exact information. I would like to know which part of my corrections are wrong. As you claim because there is any official statement about the ordinance how it is perform or how often is giving you are falling in the same mistakes that other writers for this reason let me know which part of my intervention you do not agree and I am going to send you the references.

Many thanks

José Luis

Jean Watson’s Metaparadigm of Nursing[edit]

Hi. A11 is new to me. does this apply?14:32, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Good day -- I would think so, the line that reads:

This essay will spotlight my own view of nursing and the related queries linked to it. I will survey and relate my values and beliefs why I think they are significant. I will also reflect on the thought ::of whether or not my view of nursing can affect nurses in a positive way.

Is pretty much declaring the article is original research. Lettik (talk) 14:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I don't always think of A11 at first. Dloh cierekim 16:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About the Nazi flag[edit]

why? I remember a politician sayin "The Freedom To Offend is just as important as freedom of speech." If someone's offended, that's their problem. If they don't wanna be offended, they shouldn't look at it. Why should I care about offending me? No one cares when they offend me. ProudIrishAspie (talk) 16:59, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WER/Editor of the Week aka Eddy[edit]

Thanks for you assistance at the nomination page and for seconding the nominations. It is really appreciated. Since the Award was created in Jan/2013 myself and a few others have been doing most of the behind-the-scenes editing and creating and moving and what-not. I saw that you informed Wolf That Turns of your efforts but he probably didn't know what you meant since the Nominator just nominates and we "clerks" do the rest. It's good to have you aboard and feel free to sign on as a member of the WER/Eddy clerks. One of my favorite tasks is visiting the awardee once they get the Award (which User:Go Phightins! distributes on Sunday) and adding support above and beyond the Award. Usually on Tuesday, one of us drops by and adds a userbox (which gets displayed around WikiWorld for a week) and which the awardee gets to keep it as a part of his display. There's more but what you have done is wonderful. Thanks...and welcome aboard!. ```Buster Seven Talk 23:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, and I am happy to help any way I can. I think it is a great project, many editors contribute to build and improve this encyclopedia, having a project that helps recognize them is simply a fantastic idea. Lettik (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:48, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor of the Week : nominations needed![edit]

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up a citation.

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]