User talk:Lex Kitten

Hi![edit]

Leave me a message =) Lex Kitten 07:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi back[edit]

If you visited the Madden Curse page, please visit the discussion page and give a response under the "New Poll on Vince Young". There seems to be a dispute among editors, whether he is deserves a spot on the main article page. (Mikael2200 13:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Deorphaning team[edit]

Hi there, I'm proposing to turn the deorphaning team into WikiProject Deorphan. I'd love to hear your opinion on this change at the team's talk page, you can add your name to the list of interested users here. Davidovic 01:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment at Talk:Sheffield Digital Campus[edit]

Hi there. I left a response on the page describe above, but you've not elaborated. What exactly do you mean about it being "overly descriptive? Sure an article opught to describe the subject matter? L.J.Skinner^{wot|I did} 16:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smouha Club[edit]

hi i am the one who created the article smouha club you could have just searched google for smouhaclub.com and you could have found it it's the biggest club in alexandria, egypt ...... and i was going to complete the article anyway but thanx Emam2908

Enemy (military)[edit]

This is a term that is needed in Wikipedia, it is allowed. Many terms are in both wikipedia and wiktionary. Chessy999 12:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article was posted for 30 seconds and I was still working on it. Editors waiting around the new article creation page looking for articles to hang frivolous +tags on to obtain barnstars and become famous don't impress me. Chessy999 12:42, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enemy article[edit]

I was aware of the discussion on the article's talk page. The reason I declined the speedy nom is simply that no speedy criterion applied to this specific article. If you feel that the article should be deleted from Wikipedia, you might wish to propose it for deletion (prod), or nominate it for regular deletion (AFD). A ecis^Brievenbus 00:56, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquette alarm[edit]

Don't know if you're interested, but seeing as you're involved in the debate about Enemy (military) too, I thought I'd tell you that I've filed a Wikiquette alarm about Chezzy999's conduct. You can view it here, feel free to add your opinion on the matter. David ovic 13:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

speedies=[edit]

Please read carefully WP:CSD, and notice the limited conditions under which speedy is appropriate. I and two other admins have been declining some of the speedies you have been placing. OR is not a reason for speedy, nor is being like a dictionary definition. Nor is "fairly biased, and currently does not outline the plot, or themes, or any of the other customary details that are required of book articles." Please see WP:STUB for what constitutes a minimal acceptable article.

But i congratulate you of your very good work in cleaning up orphan articles. DGG (talk) 13:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I've caused you any trouble! I'll read up on the speedy conditions. Lex Kitten 14:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

I'm very sorry I was not contact you in time because of something wrong with my Internet. Do you still remember me? I know my article was be delete because it was too small. I really want to write same articles I know for Wiki , but my English is not very well and I cannot write a much long article. What should I do, Could you tell me? Thanks very much.--Peng Peng 05:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks your help. I will try.

For your question What country I am from - I am from China and I speak Chinese. --Peng Peng 13:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LOVE/HATE[edit]

I Love that you Hate an article. Is that wrong? Master Redyva 20:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC) Thanks for the compliments. I promise to do some research and find out more about the article you hate. Or at least more about the subject of the article. Tìoraidh! -- Master Redyva (talk) 21:11, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive user[edit]

Just FYI, from this diff I can see you have had unpleasant experiences with this editor. He's at it again with the unwikipedian behavior, personal attacks, and attempts to work against consensus. -- Fyslee / talk 22:19, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope your Skies are Blue and your Days Sunny[edit]

REDYVA is thinking about Lex Kitten; I hope your Skies are Blue and your Days are Sunny forever. +

I did not know this, but knowing we both are Librans lets me know things are right with the World. Have a wonderful Holiday! Master Redyva (talk) We both advocate pacifism too. Master Redyva (talk)

Talk:BizSmart[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. J (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I do know =) Just forgot that time!Lex Kitten (talk) 01:10, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THEY TOOK IT[edit]

James thinks Everything will eventually be DELETED.

"They" deleted Falls of Neuse Road. Master Redyva :(

Not really interested in roads. I am really only interested in Falls of Neuse Road & you.

THANKS ![edit]

Thank you very much, that is the good advice I was looking for. I hope you have a fantabolous day! Thanks again. Master Redyva (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 13:59, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Merry Holidays

Nollaig chridheil agus Bliadhna mhath ùr!

A warm and wonderful Christmas wish for your friends, family & loved ones. Happy Holidays from REDYVA ^♠

Unified orphan/de-orphan process[edit]

You might be interested in this discussion.--Aervanath's signature is boring 22:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you come back[edit]

Hey, we noticed you haven't been around en.wiki for awhile, so you've been moved to the WikiProject Orphanage Inactive list. We hope you'll come back, move your name back to the active list, and get back to de-orphaning real soon! Aervanath (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please confirm your membership[edit]

This is an important message from WikiProject Wikify.

You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify.

Thank you for your support,

WikiProject Wikify

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:58, 22 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi Lex Kitten,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]