User talk:Li-reg

This is Li-reg's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ori Isaac (May 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No outstanding claim to notability and this is resume like page with poor sourcing

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 01:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Li-reg! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 01:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ori Isaac has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ori Isaac. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:09, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Savion Einstein has been accepted[edit]

Savion Einstein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Primefac (talk) 21:02, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Declare any connection[edit]

Hello Li-reg. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Ori Isaac, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Li-reg. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Li-reg|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Worldbruce (talk) 01:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was somewhat paid but its not a "full payment" or in Money. Anyhow, it is now my will to fix it and Im not getting any payment for this. Yet, I have added it to my user page. Li-reg (talk) 07:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The payment does not have to be in money(in part or totally). What is the nature of the relationship? Are you his agent or manager? You are required to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. 331dot (talk) 07:03, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no, I dont even know him personally, i was asked by a friend because I know Wikipedia but as I said it is now my will and not for any payment... Li-reg (talk) 18:31, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Savion Einstein[edit]

The article Savion Einstein has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet either WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:16, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Advice on formatting[edit]

I've done some work on Savion Einstein, an article you created. I've noticed a few things about your editing which I wanted to share with you. 1) Reference tags belong after the full stop or comma. More on this can be found at WP:CITEFOOT. 2) Titles of creative works (such as films, books, plays etc.) need to be italicised, not placed in inverted commas. More can be found at MOS:IT. I encourage you to go back to the article and fix these small issues. Best, Modussiccandi (talk) 12:31, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I will

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamutal Slovin (July 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamutal Slovin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hamutal Slovin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hamutal Slovin has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hamutal Slovin. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:58, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Theroadislong Hi, I read it but I as I wrote, I do not understand the reason behind it since there is a need for 2-3 reliable sources and I placed more. Could you recheck please? by the way, she's not the only proffesor so how come she gets declined? Li-reg (talk) 06:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamutal Slovin (July 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tamingimpala were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamutal Slovin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hamutal Slovin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tame (talk) 17:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamutal Slovin (August 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Read WP:PROF. Read it again. And again. Read it forwards, backwards, upside down and sideways until you are absolutely certain that you can cite sources that prove she meets one of its notability criteria. Then rewrite the draft, stating in the first sentence or two of the lead why she is notable. Cite the sources that prove it. Vimeo, ResearchGate, and YouTube are generally poor sources. Her employers, Bar-Ilan University and Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, are reliable, but not independent. They have a vested interest in promoting her. They would be okay for basic facts about education, awards, memberships, or positions, but not for opinions, such as the impact of her research. Omit everything for which you cannot cite a reliable source (date of birth, advised 20 masters/doctoral students, husband, daughters, etc.).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hamutal Slovin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hamutal Slovin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 14:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hamutal Slovin has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hamutal Slovin. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 01:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hamutal Slovin has been accepted[edit]

Hamutal Slovin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 01:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Assaf Ran[edit]

Hello, Li-reg. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Assaf Ran, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benjamin Freidenberg (April 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Benjamin Freidenberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick note. There is a lot of information in the draft which does not have an inline reference. This will need to be referenced or removed. The sources are also mainly primary or not in-depth about the subject. They verify the person exists but don't really count towards notability. If you are able to correct these things you can ping me or reach out on my talk page and I will have another look. Finally, if this is a WP:PAID project, please make sure to complete the appropriate disclosure as required. Cheers!--CNMall41 (talk) 22:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Benjamin Freidenberg has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Benjamin Freidenberg. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 23:55, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]