User talk:Liamrrr34

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Liamrrr34, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NGC 895 (January 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Liamrrr34! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angel Bastardo (January 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 19:04, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Jackarrrr per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackarrrr. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:51, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock please[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Liamrrr34 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The edits I made on JackArrrr were not to intend to be a sock puppet. If you look closely at our names we both end with an R. This is because we are brothers. He started making articles about galaxies and I thought it was cool so I made a wikipedia account. I thought it would be funny to make a few minor edits and he thought it was annoying so he reverted the edits. Now hes explaining to me what a sock puppet is and I realized that all his hard work could be taked away because of my horrible sense of humor. I am writing this for two reasons, to get my account unblocked because I think wikipedia is interesting, and to make sure my brothers work doesn't go down the drain. Thank you.

Accept reason:

OK to unblock per blocking check user. Welcome back.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As described in WP:FAMILY, it is important to note that you may share technical details (such as your IP address) when you edit similar articles. This is because we cannot know (until you disclose this) that you have a reasonable explanation for sharing an IP address with another account. The default position on this is to assume that you are the same user in this case.
In my opinion, the evidence from the checkuser tool suggests that your explanation is plausible. So that you receive an independent review, I will leave your unblock request to another checkuser. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Liamrrr34 (talk) 16:33, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm told that your brother has been sending weird emails. What's all that about? Spicy (talk) 22:25, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by "Weird Emails"? I don't have access to his email. Liamrrr34 (talk) 01:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackarrrr. Spicy (talk) 01:25, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Emailed me asking for a "User Check" on FlightTime (unclear if this was related to running a checkuser check or checking comments made by another user). Saw some suspicious edits and ran a check." I think I know what this was about, he was telling me about an edit war on the Andromeda Galaxy and he reported someone to Dreamy Jazz for reverting the image too many times. Is that it? Liamrrr34 (talk) 13:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So am I going to be unblocked? Liamrrr34 (talk) 16:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If the other account is your brother's then could you explain what you mean in your unblock request by The edits I made on JackArrrr? - Aoidh (talk) 16:16, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean? I'm just referring to his account. The edits I made were minor spelling mistakes and I thought it would be funny to change them. Liamrrr34 (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For context, here is the story -
I make articles about galaxies, and I was involved in an edit war over the Andromeda Galaxy. I emailed Dreamy Jazz about a person who cussed out another person, but instead I got an email saying how I am involved in a sock puppet investigation (Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jackarrrr). But let me rewind a little. My brother made an account later December(?), and thought it was funny to edit one of my articles I created (ESO 0313-192). I reverted his edits, and told him to stop in real life. Now looking at the situation, its just hard to see that he is blocked over a misunderstanding, and its also hard to think that I might just loose all of my progress over this.
Again, Liamrrr34 is my brother. Jackarrrr (talk) 18:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Dreamy Jazz: This is too weird to be malign. Would you like to unblock? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would not oppose an unblock. Feel free to unblock (and to ignore the CU block part of this block for unblocking purposes). I'm a little busy right now, so wouldn't be able to unblock myself. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 13:33, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liamrrr34&oldid=1200965293"