User talk:Liberty842

April 2013[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Gok Wan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gok Wan was changed by Liberty842 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853947 on 2013-04-19T14:14:31+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:14, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gok Wan[edit]

Hi Liberty842,

I reverted your edits to Gok Wan. You removed a great deal of content and many references without any explanation. I cannot discern your intent as you have not used edit summaries or any other means of communication with other editors. It may be better if you discuss your concerns at Talk:Gok Wan so that we can introduce improvements to the article without gutting existing content.

Please note external links are generally not used within the body of an article per WP:EL. Wikilinks to other Wikipedia articles are better.

Thank you, Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 00:53, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Leaky Caldron 14:56, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Leaky Caldron 09:45, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Leaky Caldron 12:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advocacy and Conflict of Interest[edit]

You have been identified [1] as editing in the specific interests of one of your clients. Please see WP:ADVOCACY and WP:COI. You must edit in accordance with the goals of Wikipedia. Please see WP:5P, WP:NPOV, WP:RS, WP:UNDUE and various other linked policies and guidelines. If you continue to add content against these policies you may be blocked from editing here. All articles you have edited for your clients have been tagged to ensure that other editors are aware of your potential conflict of interest. Leaky Caldron 12:49, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Liberty842", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. January (talk) 15:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Alexf^(talk) 17:05, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Liberty842 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Tequester2000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

now fully understand the terms of wikipedia Liberty842 (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

No response to query below in three days. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 17:04, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]