User talk:Light&highbeautyforever

Disambiguation link notification for January 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fluorescent penetrant inspection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defect. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Light&highbeautyforever! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ‑‑Volteer1 (talk) 00:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete text in K-Quarantine[edit]

K-Quarantine#Drive-through testing has incomplete text "Kit that detects both flu and COVID-19", added here. PrimeHunter (talk) 16:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review trade[edit]

Hi there. I couldn't help but notice you have an article awaiting review at WP:GAN#LAW. I've recently listed an article for review there myself, that is of similar length to yours. In my experience articles can sit at GAN for many, many months awaiting a review, so I was wondering if there was any chance you'd be interested in speeding up the process trading reviews? So I'll review your nomination and in return (either once yours is finished or simultaneously, whichever suits you) you could review my own? Please be thorough with your review though and don't feel awkward about failing it if you don't think it's up to scratch, as I will be doing the same. No worries if you're too busy or otherwise not interested though. I just figured there was no harm in asking. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 02:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Damien Linnane--sure, I would be open to that. This would be my first review so I'd need to make sure I study how to do it properly, but I am happy to collaborate/trade. 02:51, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Feel free to take your time with the review, and you can always ask for assistance from Wikipedia:Good article help/mentor if you think you need a hand or if you just want someone to look at your review once it's done to make sure it's on the right track. I've done many reviews though I actually haven't done one for three years so I need to refresh my own memory on the process a bit myself. I'll start the review of your article now though. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 05:46, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay great Damien Linnane, thanks. I will get to work and I appreciate the opportunity. Light&highbeautyforever (talk) 01:22, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your finished review, as the mentor noted you did a really good job of it. No rush, but let me know at the review page of your own nomination once you've finished making all the changes. Oh and just in case it isn't clear, if the sources don't go into any further detail on the subjects I asked you to expand then obviously you don't need to do that and it can be passed as is. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 14:19, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leigh Saufley[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Leigh Saufley you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Damien Linnane -- Damien Linnane (talk) 06:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leigh Saufley[edit]

The article Leigh Saufley you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Leigh Saufley for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Damien Linnane -- Damien Linnane (talk) 06:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leigh Saufley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New England.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leigh Saufley[edit]

The article Leigh Saufley you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Leigh Saufley for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Damien Linnane -- Damien Linnane (talk) 08:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Damien Linnane for proposing this collaboration and for the excellent review. You have prompted me to become a GA reviewer now. Appreciate all the effort. Light&highbeautyforever (talk) 13:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. Glad to hear you're becoming a reviewer too. Wikipedia certainly needs more. :) Damien Linnane (talk) 14:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Genevieve McDonald[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Genevieve McDonald you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aussie Article Writer -- Aussie Article Writer (talk) 18:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I thought I’d add a personal note to let you know that despite the nomination failing, there is much to commend about the article. Its referencing is excellent, and it gives enough information to give a general overview of McDonald. So I’d like to thank you for your efforts and let you know how much I appreciate your contributions to the article. Keep up the great work, I value it and I know others do too. - Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Genevieve McDonald[edit]

The article Genevieve McDonald you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Genevieve McDonald for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aussie Article Writer -- Aussie Article Writer (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Anti-vaccine activist"[edit]

Hello. I've noticed you've been adding "Anti-vaccine activist" to the lead of several BLPs of politicians, and writing heavily about their vaccine-related activities, which I believe distorts and misrepresents the source material and pushes a point-of-view in disproportion to (or in absence of) its coverage in reliable secondary sources. I've stated my concerns a Talk:Anne Dauphinais, and have edited that article to address them. I see similar issues at Chris A. Johansen, e.g. it appears you alone are inferring that criticism of COVID-19 lockdown measures, mask requirements, or vaccine mandates equates with anti-vaccine activism. While some clickbait sources use terms like "anti-vaxx rally" in headlines, the articles clarify the rallies are "opposing new vaccine mandates for health care workers" (note also post 2013 Newsweek is considered not generally reliable). With politically controversial and sensitive issues, especially anything COVID-19 related, it is important to be extra vigilant against any personal biases, straying from source material, or presenting and arranging true statements in a way that misrepresents the context. Please review WP:BLPBALANCE, WP:BLPCAT, MOS:LABEL, WP:COP and WP:COPDEF, and strive to give BLPs on politicians equal care and consideration, regardless of party. Cheers, --Animalparty! (talk) 19:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PROD Dave Thomas (skeptic)[edit]

Proposed deletion of Dave Thomas (skeptic)[edit]

The article Dave Thomas (skeptic) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 15:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Maine House of Representatives election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Underwood.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]