User talk:Lillie8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk[edit]

Hi Please provide references for Prime Minister of Sri Lanka Page. 649pardeep (talk)

sources requested - 1) http://www.pmoffice.gov.lk/ 2) http://www.parliament.lk/en/prime-ministers/

November 2018[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ranil Wickremesinghe, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:42, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:43, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

All references are sited. Wikipedia is a user generated encyclopedia and we all are obliged give correct information to the public. You are showing disputes that are not in place. If you go to Gov websites it is very clear. Kindly refrain from editing false information with your personal interests in articles as you are misleading the public and this This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. 2:23, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Sri Lanka[edit]

Now, stop your controversial edits. --Panam2014 (talk) 20:08, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

@Panam2014 Please provide trusted sources for your edits. My edits are NOT controversial but yours is as mine are cited by a reliable source as GOV. Refrain from giving incorrect information to the public as this violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. 4:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Stop now. The page is the POV of Sri Lanka president. Stop now. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See here. Your edits are POV. --Panam2014 (talk) 11:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

@Panam2014 Media sources are nothing but profit targeted organizations who will publish any lie to get people's attraction and and money. They cannot be trusted. I challenge you to cite a SL government source if RW is the current PM of SL. 12:33, 20 November, 2018

Stop now. Your behaviour is WP:DISRUPTIVE. In an encyclopedia, the regime POV is not the truth. --Panam2014 (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mifter (talk) 19:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lillie8 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know why you have blocked me when I have given proper government sources for all my edits. People with hatred are the ones who keeps making controversial edits in these very sensitive pages. I would like to know why my page was blocked when my edits had correct supporting sources while all other edits were done completely based on hatred to the topic in question.

Decline reason:

As it says in the block message, you are blocked for edit warring. Please read WP:EW. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:14, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Mahinda Rajapaksa. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:27, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018[edit]

User:FlightTime Kindly stop changing content in Mahinda Rajapaksa as its disputed only with one regime which seems that you are in. President has mentioned multiple times that Ranil Wickremesinghe will not be appointed as PM [1]

Your edit was unsourced or even explained, you stop or did that block teach you nothing ? (We don't have "regime's in America) - FlightTime (open channel) 15:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:FlightTime If thats the case, I will source it and edit it now. Kindly don't remove it if you are not connected to any regime.

I am a long standing member of Wikipedia :P - FlightTime (open channel) 15:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ ""I will not make Ranil Wickremesinghe Prime Minister in this life," President Sirisena told Sri Lanka's Colombo based foreign correspondents Sunday".

A page you started (Jayatilleke De Silva) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Jayatilleke De Silva.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Jayatilleke De Silva.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aegis Services LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon 09:30, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

I reverted your edit to User talk:Justlettersandnumbers where you removed messages from other editors. Please don't do that. --David Biddulph (talk) 10:53, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Director-General of Presidential Media in Sri Lanka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Director-General of Presidential Media in Sri Lanka until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  11:42, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]