User talk:Lipton1995

Welcome!

Hello, Lipton1995, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 14:37, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rhône-Alpes region logo[edit]

I recently undid your change to the logo of region Rhône-Alpes. The link here [1] is from the region's official website and shows the correct logo. Please refrain from perpetuating the changes to this and other regions' flags and logos initially started by User:Virgile1991 (is this also you?). Kiwipete 02:35, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quebec[edit]

Don't remove information that important from the article without discussing it first (FYI-English must be used in the courts/legislature because of Federal Laws/The Constitution and I know Quebec didn't sign it but they are still bound by it by decision of the Supreme Court). -Royalguard11(T·R!) 17:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously someone else disagrees with you. Please stop removing cited information. The next time it will be considered vandalism. If you wish to discuss it, use the article talk page. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 04:04, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove sourced information from articles, discuss issues on the article talkpage.--Isotope23 ^talk 20:14, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English has an official statu perhaps in the Quebec but its place is not in the infrabox! It is you the "vandal" ! Me I live in the Québec, of you of in the Saskatchewan then I think that I know the Québec better than you! Furthermore if English has an official statu in the Quebec then French has an official statu in the Saskatchewan !?!?!

Thanks! bye Lipton1995 20:19, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Quebec, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Gscshoyru 20:38, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop embarassing Québecois[edit]

When you vandalize pages dealing with our proud history, you make us all look bad. Frankly, mon frere, you merely add to the contempt others have for our people when you act this way. If you cannot edit the articles constructively, then I am afraid it doesn't matter from what place you come from. Monsieurdl 21:53, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR violation at the Quebec article[edit]

Hello, Please be advised that you are in violation of the 3-revert rule on the Quebec article. This is a formal warning; should you continue in reverting to your version, you will be reported for violation of the 3RR rule, and may be blocked accordingly. Rather than reverting, you are invited to discuss the issue on the talk page and seek resolution there.--Ramdrake (talk) 19:07, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been reported for 3RR violation on Quebec and have been blocked for 24 hours. Please take the time to carefully review our WP:3RR policy. You are welcome to contribute, but you must edit collaboratively. Edit warring is less likely to achieve the results you want. Thanks, Crum375 (talk) 19:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me add another point: even if you feel very strongly about an issue, you should not label edits that you disapprove of, made by your fellow editors, as "vandalism", as you did here. In Wikipedia, Vandalism refers specifically to edits intended to damage the encyclopedia in the eyes of their contributor. Edits you disagree with, even if to you they may appear incorrect, are still valid in the eyes of their contributors, and intended by them to improve the encyclopedia. Calling such edits "vandalism" is a violation of WP:CIVIL. Crum375 (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

France[edit]

I'd love if you could comment when you undo edits (or anyone's for that matter), so I know what is going on :)... -- lucasbfr ^talk 20:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]