User talk:Lisashelby

Your submission at Articles for creation: ThePricer (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ThePricer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Lisashelby! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Undisclosed paid editing

Hello Lisashelby. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:ThePricer, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Lisashelby. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Lisashelby|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

I have no financial stake in promoting this topic. I am not receiving or expect to receive compensation for this edit, as this is the first one I have made. I found Wikipedia editing exciting and tried my hand at it. I picked ThePricer as a website of medium size that had no Wikipedia page but still had some discussions around it that were worth mentioning. Lisashelby (talk) 12:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

You do not have to be paid specifically to edit Wikipedia for this policy to apply. Being employed by the company you write about is, by itself, sufficent. Please also see the note about corporate notablity below, as there are criteria for any company to merit inclusion at all. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Notability

Wikipedia is not a business directory, so a company is not entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because it exists. All topics must be notable by Wikipedia's definition to merit inclusion. In the specific case of a company, it must meet the notability criteria for companies and organizations. For this to happen, the company must have already received significant coverage in multiple reliable and independent sources. We have no interest in what a company wishes to say about itself, as this is an inherent conflict of interest. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:ThePricer

Hello, Lisashelby. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ThePricer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:ThePricer

Hello, Lisashelby. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ThePricer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)