User talk:Little Will

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Little Will! Thank you for your contributions. I am Gorthian and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! — Gorthian (talk) 16:45, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Little Will, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Little Will! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:31, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Form follows function, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aleson Shipping Lines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Car ferry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Evans Brewery draft[edit]

I have moved the draft to User:WeirdlyLoveable/sandbox. It doesn't really make a lot of difference, but it seems slightly more natural to have it in the userspace of the editor who created it. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:20, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine thanks. Little Will (talk) 17:48, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Episcopal Diocese of the Armed Services and Federal Ministries

added a link pointing to Department of Veterans Affairs

Long Island University

added a link pointing to TESOL

Moira Lassen

added a link pointing to Weightlifting

Regularity structure

added a link pointing to Anderson model

The Grand Sweets and Snacks

added a link pointing to Franchise

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

STOP DEFACING MY WORK[edit]

I can see that you are adding some remarks next to references in the article Senorita India. Either you can't read what's in the reference article or you just don't like my work. The references that I have added are definitely closely related to the subject and you are adding citations like dead link , not reliable and what not in my article. You can't stalk my work and article all the time.
You think that the references are not good enough in my article?? Then go and see references in many major articles, it will be worse than this but still no speedy deletion tag will be added in that page and no citation problem tag will be added in that page. I request you to please spare my article for some time till I can update it still more. CyberBrinda (talk) 03:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They're not remarks, they're maintenance tags. Please read Wikipedia:Ownership of content. It's not your article, it's Wikipedia's article. Most of the references you've given appear to have been pasted from elsewhere: the links are dead, the access dates are from years ago, etc. If something is unreferenced in an article, then a reference is needed. If I don't add the tags, then another editor will, because it needs a lot of cleanup. Little Will (talk) 12:47, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, you thought that my article Senorita India was just a lazy copy paste article. Why? Because of a gallery or a single table? Is this not a copy paste article [[1]] which I did not create. Even this article has a "gallery of winners" and a "winner's table" copy pasted from Femina Miss India. It doesn't even have that many references. But after a few weeks or months all that will be resolved in time. But you will not stalk or complain about it because I did not create the article. You didn't even give one day time as the "new winners of the pageant 'Senorita Miss International India' would have been declared tomorrow & it would have been published in many news and leading articles and the references would have been fixed". I am not engaging in a wiki - war you, but you did everything you could for having the article deleted. I am sorry for the troubles
Thank You
CyberBrinda (talk) 09:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop refactoring other editors' talk page posts. You're going to get blocked if you keep doing this.

You keep pointing out other examples of bad articles as justification for creating new bad articles, which makes zero sense. You've also twice now accused me of "stalking", when I have so far only attempted to fix two articles you started: Senorita India and Senorita India 2016. That's not "stalking".

I see only one editor abusing editing privileges here. If you think I've breached Wikipedia rules, you're perfectly free to report me to the admins. Little Will (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Best wishes[edit]

From Cyphoidbomb,
who is thanking you for the amount of support and dedication you gave....to, Little Will.
CyberBrinda (talk) 01:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What on earth are you on about now. Give it a rest. Little Will (talk) 19:53, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Do not delete from my talkpage[edit]

Do not remove or put back anything from my talkpage as you did here [2] [3]. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. CyberBrinda (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, you're free to report me to the admins if you think I've broken any rules. Guess which one of us will be blocked? Little Will (talk) 20:30, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a legitimate warning. CyberBrinda, you may remove comments from your talk page, but you may not refactor (change) another editor's comment. Here you removed a big portion of Kautilya3's welcome message and you appear to have done it again here. If these were mistakes, then you need to double-check your posts by clicking "Show preview" and "Show changes" before saving your edits. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:35, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

please[edit]

If you have any personal problems with me, then please don't show by defacing my work for for no reason. Because it looks like you don't want me in wiki and is troubling you so much that you have to stalk me all the time.Just give it a break, will you.
thank you, CyberBrinda (comment) 21:21 , 16 September 2016 (UTC)

I have no personal problems with you, I'm not stalking you, and I'm not defacing anything. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment, and when I see something broken, I fix it, just like the thousands of other editors here. I've done a lot of copyediting and fixing of references on articles that you've worked on, so it puzzles me when you revert my fixes. If there was an edit conflict, please accept my apologies. Little Will (talk) 16:03, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please don't argue that you don't have any problem with me, because you definitely have. If you have no knowledge about any beauty pageants and still you can judge the article just like that. By the way, keep on adding "deletion tags" to every article that I created for no reason. Because that is what you are capable of, just sit behind a screen and criticize every thing and not understand the hard work that a person puts to write an entire article.
CyberBrinda (comment) 2:30 , 17 September 2016 (UTC)

I certainly understand that you've put a lot of work into the article, but notability guidelines still apply. Similarly, if I wrote a long, detailed, heavily-referenced article about myself, it would also rightly get deleted, because there's nothing notable about me by Wikipedia standards.

There are many beauty pageant and contestant articles on Wikipedia, on subjects which are both non-notable and blatantly promotional. I've only scratched the surface so far. Little Will (talk) 09:22, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All articles evolve through time. You can't expect an article to be picture perfect within days after it is created. For example, you have added deletion tag in the article Rewati Chetri because she has not won anything , even though she has participated in so may pageants and has even made it to the final cut in pageants like Femina Miss India. You have no idea about pageantry, even making as a 'finalist' in a pageant like Femina Miss India is a big deal. And Pankhuri Gidwani has even won the crown and going to participate internationally, even that is not enough for you. I don't understand why are you so eager to have that articles deleted so soon. What if Rewati Chetri wins Miss International 2016 and what if Pankhuri Gidwani wins Miss Grand International.?? All that is going to occur in just a month. You can't wait for such a short time? You have a personal problem with me and that is no reason you keep on adding deletion tags in every article you find. You have not created any article in a long time but you can just delete articles because you have no regard for other's hard work.
CyberBrinda (comment) 5:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

It's not so soon, and they're not a few days old: Rewati Chetri was created in January, and Pankhuri Gidwani was created over a month ago. Also, mere participation in a pageant doesn't on its own meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. A pageant contestant could be notable if they had actually won a notable contest, but neither of them have yet. When they do, then there should certainly be an article about them. Little Will (talk) 12:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, Rewati Chetri has won "Miss International India" and is going to compete in Miss International 2016 which is a notable pageant and Pankhuri Gidwani has won "Miss Grand India" crown and will participate in Miss Grand International. Only according to you that is not considered as victory. You're so ignorant and don't have that much information regarding pageantry and deleting all my articles has become the sole aim in your life.
CyberBrinda (comment) 6:29 , 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Enough of the name-calling, please. Please be WP:CIVIL when discussing differences of opinion with other editors. Thank you. Little Will (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Dewey Mitchell

added a link pointing to Olympian

Hadi Model School

added a link pointing to Islamic education

Joseph Bost

added a link pointing to Olympic

Kambi Group

added a link pointing to B2B

LLM Lettering

added a link pointing to Expressway

Levinson's Theorem

added a link pointing to Zero energy

Lindsey Webster

added a link pointing to Contemporary jazz

Roy Moore (wrestler)

added a link pointing to Black belt

Stagecoach North East

added a link pointing to Sunderland

The Little Death (1996 film)

added a link pointing to Jan Verheyen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Little Will. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"I(Bengali)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect I(Bengali) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 6#I(Bengali) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evan Evans Brewery for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Evans Brewery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Evans Brewery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:53, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]