User talk:Lllo3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I am going to try to clean up your edits to conform with Wikipedian stylistic conventions without merely reverting them. However, it is important to inform you that you are not following well-thought-out guidelines in your editing. Your edits may be improvements content-wise, but they are detrimental style-wise. I know we got off to a rocky start, but I fear that your don't have (or don't use) the requisite knowledge of Wikipedian form to make maximally useful edits. As it stands, the Lombards article has lost readability and encyclopaedicity, even if it is now more sourced and factual. This tradeoff is not acceptable, both standards (concerning style and content) must be met for this project to work. I am just notifying you, since this is the reason that our original spat began: over reversions I made to stylistically detrimental edits. Srnec 00:48, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@Srnec,
I couldnt respond to your talkpage, so i respond on here. I absolutely understand, what you wrote. That was never the problem if my edits dont meet certain format requiries, than i ask them to be cleaned up accordingly. The problem was that content was being erased without explanation, content i thought was very important for a Lombard article. Should i in future, first post my edits to you, so you can tell me how to correct it or correct it yourself? Before posting it on Wikipedia? Lllo3
It's fine if you just edit it to the article. I will clean up any format issues. The real problem which prompted my reverts some months back was that there was too much to reformt properly. This is why it is often a good idea to make major edits is pieces, so that other edits can easily clean up any stylistic issues without having to go over the whole article. As long as you make edits in installments, I will keep my eye on the Lombards article and clean it up to meet stylistic conventions. Also, I changed the footnoting format: could you please add your sources (author, title, publisher, date) to the "References" section now? Srnec 15:54, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the titles in the Refernce section. Why do you actually have such a strong interest in the Lombards? are you from Italy? Or Hungary, Slovenia or Croatia? I found that Hungarians, Slovenians and Croatians also have an interest in this Germanic tribe. Lllo3

I am Canadian. Interestingly, I do have a Croatian background (Srnec). I am interested in the Lombards largely as an outgrowth of an interest in Italian medieval history. I am a bit of an Italophile, but I couldn't identify why exactly. Srnec 05:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I couldnt respond earlier due to alot of work. Well, the Lombards are interesting because they are the survivors of the Germanic migration people and conquerers. I already saw your changes, and they are good. I want to add a section of the Lombards on the Balkans, (noricum, pannonia, byzantium, herules, gepids) all that time. Hope you will help there to. Lllo3

File source problem with File:IMAGE12.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE12.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE16.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE16.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE24.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE24.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:57, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE32.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE32.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:59, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE34.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE34.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE40.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE40.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE38.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE38.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:07, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE42.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE42.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:IMAGE48.PNG[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:IMAGE48.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 01:11, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Long444.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]