User talk:Lmcd1999

May 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to François Forster— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 15:31, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Heidi Cruz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been or will be undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fylbecatulous talk 15:32, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1800 in architecture, you may be blocked from editing. Fylbecatulous talk 15:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Poaceae, you may be blocked from editing. Fylbecatulous talk 15:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Fernando Martín Espina. Fylbecatulous talk 15:36, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — MusikAnimal ^talk 15:52, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]