User talk:LokiTheLiar/Times and Telegraph RFC prep

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Possible other articles[edit]

I don't know if any of the articles used at Great Ormond Street Hospital#Gender identity are a problem or not, although someone might want to check. (Sorry this is unlikely to be me.) Nil Einne (talk) 16:49, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Times[edit]

My free time is stretched thin right now so my contributions on this front may be regrettably sporadic, but the case right now is a lot stronger for the Telegraph than it is for the Times. Snokalok (talk) 17:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, we're going to have to do them one by one anyway, for a bunch of good reasons. Let's focus on the telegraph for now --Licks-rocks (talk) 13:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's very quickly become obvious to me that the Telegraph is 10x worse than the Times, and probably 100x worse than any other paper out there.
Like, we already have sources from the US Guardian calling out the UK Guardian for problems reporting on trans issues, and the Telegraph is so much worse than the UK Guardian. Loki (talk) 23:19, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NY times[edit]

I know this rfc prep mainly focused on the British Times and Telegraph, but I came across this article from media matters that called out The NY Times as well as fueling the anti-trans coverage, so this may be something to consider for the future - [1] Raladic (talk) 23:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]