User talk:Long Robin 79

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello! Thanks for your offer of help with this article. My main concern was that it had got very out of date. I have just read your suggestions for editing and they look fine to me. I agree that Dutch Flyer should definitely not be in there. It is a service or a brand but not a TOC. I suggest you just get cracking and I will keep an eye on it and get back to you. -- Alarics (talk) 08:21, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have spoken to ATOC about who is a TOC as the list provided in the current entry is confusing enough, for a TOC to bid for a franchise they must be a member of ATOC. My understanding is therefore the only list of TOC's needed to be included is that listed in the ATOC website Link, it currently lists 24 with 1 being listed as Open Access. I would also suggest/promote the removal of the Railtours section, these are normally run by travel companies hiring freight trains and as such are not members of ATOC. LongRobin79(talk) 11:00, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I agree about Railtours - completely out of place. However, I would suggest adding Eurostar to the list even though it is not a normal TOC but a special case like Heathrow Express. -- Alarics (talk) 11:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Eurostar is was already on the list. It is a TOC that is a member of ATOC and providing a service within the UK.
  • I'm still unsure what to do about the changes section, all the information is relevant but is largely un-sourced apart from other links to wiki pages, meaning a great deal of the information is elsewhere and possibly inaccurate.
  • future toc's - Greater Anglia appears to be the replacement for National Express East Anglia and is therefore not a new toc but a renamed or taken over toc. It's not yet a member of atoc I suspect that it's just waiting on ATOC pulling the finger out and updating their website. However its parent company Abellio controls "northern rail" which is a ATOC member
  • intercity-westcoast however does appear to be a new route which will therefore require a new toc. LongRobin79(talk) 12:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the page, since it seems to have been created by a mistake: User:Long Robin 79/sandbox already exists. If you want me to, I'll restore the page and merge their histories at User:Long Robin 79/sandbox. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 18:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that I'm kinda new to this and did not understand fully what Iwas doing though it seems I was creating a page!! LongRobin79(talk) 20:47, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks[edit]

Hello, Long Robin 79. You have new messages at TheJJJunk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ISBNs in Cite book[edit]

Hi, re the ref that you added to Class 321 - when using the |isbn= parameter in templates such as {{cite book}}, please use only one ISBN - using two, or adding punctuation such as commas, will cause the link to fail. That is, instead of |isbn=1847286437, 9781847286437 use either |isbn=1847286437 or |isbn=9781847286437 --Redrose64 (talk) 16:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, thats the first time I've attempted a ISBN ref so I'm not suprised I made a mistake, but I am annoyed that I made it! Thank You for correcting it Long Robin 79 (talk) 17:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The 13-digit version is to be preferred (they always begin with 978). -- Alarics (talk) 20:57, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]