User talk:Loquesoy

Hilary Duff

First of all, I do not "stalk" you, but checking edits by another editor is absolutely acceptable per guidelines. If I have objections to an edit you make, it isn't because they were made by you, but because there are problems with you edit. We do not italicize things in the Notes column, you removed a note without giving an explanation, and you made a film that is still listed as a 2010 film to 2011, out of order in the filmography and placed it in between other 2010 films. And while we're at it, you have made some very inappropriate edit summaries in regard to this article: here where you allege vandalism and the same here. And that last revert that called it vandalism was a revert to an edit by an administrator. You'll end up blocked with conduct like that. I suppose it never occurred to you that what you edited has been reverted by at least 3 other editors, that actually makes a consensus against your edits. Please stop edit warring against multiple editors to restore your preferred version. There is no requirement whatsoever that a consensus is required for edits made to a page that go against formatting standards such as you made here. You don't pay any attention to objections by others. We don't link to other sections of an article to cover release dates, and you took allof the references for specific facts in the article that require a reference and shoved them to a section at the bottom of the page. That is totally improper. Any content you add must be thoroughly and reliably sourced. You failed to do that also. I notice that someone else reverted your changes to that article as well. YOu have been here all of three weeks, I'd suggest you take the reverts that are made to your edits as an opportunity to learn how things are supposed to be done instead of calling reverts by established editors as vandalism. I notice that you have engaged in this conduct since you came here and I warn you that it will not be tolerated much longerWildhartlivie (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

I cannot read what you wrote, but please don't bother to come posting to my talk page over anything to do with Hilary Duff. You've been reverted multiple times on articles about her by multiple editors, take that as a clue. Your edits are inappropriate. We list films that are not yet released so your removal of a film from the filmography is wrong. Bonnie and Clyde is still listed as a 2010 film. Please learn to type English a bit better so we can figure out what you are trying to say. And please desist from threats. Your edits are unsupported and inappropriate and you are skirting on violating WP:3RR, which will get you blocked. STOP. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Dignity

A recent edit you made to Dignity (album) was a sneaky revert (not mentioned in the edit summary) back to a version of the page from several months ago. Such a revert without discussion is inappropriate and consensus should be gained before we go back to a version of the page from that long ago, especially considering the major changes that have taken place since. –Chase (talk) 20:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

The picture of Gwen Stefani is included because it is relevant to the section (Duff cited inspiration from her and critics noted musical similarities). I am not "stalking" your edits and I reverted your recent one since it was a revert to a version of the page from months ago, after the page had significantly changed. The Dignity article is one I am a frequent contributor to, therefore I watch after it. I'm obviously open to changes from other editors as that is what Wikipedia is about, but reverts to rather old versions of pages without any kind of discussion or consensus is extremely inappropriate. –Chase (talk) 20:59, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Please see FAs (Wiki's best articles) such as Thriller (album) which discuss impact of previous album. It's relevant. Please stop leaving messages on my talk page about what in the article you disagree with, the article talk page is where such things are supposed to go. Thanks. –Chase (talk) 00:27, 22 May 2010 (UTC)