User talk:Lordarchitect

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not really, this relates how the bagoong product was produced or manufactured in the Philippines in large commercial quantities and in a sanitary manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordarchitect (talkcontribs)

Please move the info on bagoong currently on "Category:Food companies by country" to another location or a separate article. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 18:58, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you ask that. This is about a Philippine food company in the Philippines- how it came about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordarchitect (talkcontribs) Are you saying that in this category, it is only a listing of food companies?

  • For goodness sake, could you not see that a category is a special sort of page - you do not vandalise it with a description of one specific food company. In any case, your text is, I am sorry to say, hopelessly unencyclopedic: we do not want a first person chatty reminisence. Please publish it on one of your own websites. You will probably find that a link to it from bagoong terong will be accepted. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 03:19, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello, Lordarchitect. I see you're new to Wikipedia. Welcome! A category page is just a list of pages; it usually doesn't have text on it. The best page for what you want to include would probably be Bagoong terong. But please note that material added to Wikipedia articles has to meet Wikipedia's standards of verifiability, neutral point of view and no original research. That means that anything you want to add has to be based on already-published reliable sources, which can be listed as footnotes or references at the bottom of the page. Please don't add anything to the category page again. I suggest that you discuss the material you want to add at Talk:Bagoong terong and see if other editors of that page are agreeable to including some of it in the Bagoong terong page. If you add something to a page or change it and someone reverts your change, please discuss it on the talk page (click "discussion" at the top of the article) until there is consensus instead of putting your change back in. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! It may take some getting used to, but I hope you enjoy it and decide to stay. Feel free to ask me questions on my talk page. --Coppertwig (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Firstly, I was taken to task for the tone of my remark above. If it was too biting, my apologies. Now, re your shouting at talk:Filipino Traditional Food:Bagoong. You now have three people independently telling you what is wrong with your edits. You call it "bullying"; I call it a clear demonstration that you are not following editorial policy.
We already have an article about bagoong terong. Creating another one is in violation of our fork policy. In any case, sentences such as "as a young boy, I remember my mother always making bagoong at home for home use" do not belong in an encyclopedia. To repeat and expand my advice: publish your reminiscences somewhere else. I have copied your text to "bagoong" at editthis and I have created a link to it in the bagoong terong article. Feel free to improve both. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:59, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To RHaworth and others, learn how to be a little nice. Being a veteran on this site, you should be mentors- not harassers. Learn about manners. And also: Little knowledge is dangerous! You may know everything about Wikipedia's format but I doubt you know anything about bagoong. They stink! For your education: bagoong terong should be terong bagoong- like peperoni pizza! Terong is maybe a sub, sub category of bagoong. And also, terong is a name of the fish. And bagoong could be made from many kinds of fishes. Now maybe you need to edit again what you created *1*. If you think about it, everything is a memoir, history may be another word for it.

Apologies above, accepted! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordarchitect (talkcontribs)

  • OK. If so, don't hide the info. here - go ahead: move the article and improve it. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 06:46, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RHaworth, now I don't know what you want me to do. Being a veteran, help me out here. I still don't know my way around "WIKI." And thanks for listening. I am just a newbie. I may be a little chatty on some parts because I am part of the story like a chronicler? If I were one of the crews of Magellan and I am retelling his adventures and travels, I'll be chatty too- if you understand what I mean.But of course we can improve on it.. lordachitect

  • I don't actually want you to do anything, I was merely saying that if you think an article can be improved, go and improve it! (You click the "edit this page" tab.) That is what Wikipedia is all about. However I recommend you not to change the article title: according to Google bagoong terong is two orders of magnitude more common than terong bagoong. Re *1* above: I have created nothing significant on this subject, this was my one edit. Why not start an article about the fish? -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 19:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why have you not set up an e-mail address? Now that your article has been moved out, we should be discussing it off Wikipedia. Please see this user talk page. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rhaworth, I don't know why my article is deleted again. It seems like someone wants to broadcast misinformation about Bagoong. Bagoong Terong is being advertised as the Main subject of bagoong when it is only one of the minor subtopic. I don't have much time loggin in on Wekipedia but now my article is delete again! Why? I don't know. Do you?


It was an unintended mistake[edit]

I was going to delete the advertising on the Terong page. I left a few minutes and I quess somebody touch my computer.

Sorry.

What's going on?[edit]

I don't know why my article is deleted again. I have been working on it for awhile but now my article is removed again! Why? And also bagoong Terong is being perpetuated as a Main Topic when it is just a minor subject under Bagoong. I just noticed that somebody has put advertising on a business on Terong!

Please restore my article!

Somebody in authority should check on the Bagoong hierarchy, otherwise misinformation is being broadcasted at Wikipedia's expense! ... Lordarchitect

Bagoong is a very important Philippine product, please consider it...http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:WPPhilippines