User talk:Loriendrew/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 ← Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Need help

My user name is Jewel Inc. and I work closely with the Grammy nominated artist Jewel. I have tried a number of times to clarify and update Jewel’s biography page. I noticed that you had reverted my edits back. I do have sources I can “but I do not know how to put that in a coding format. If I get you the information in the sources can the page be updated properly to reflect the truth. Jewel Inc (talk) 03:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

I am sorry your first experience editing here was not as productive as you had hoped. User:C.Fred was the person who reverted your edits, although given time I would have done the same. As he mentioned on your talk page the edits were unsourced, which are a fundamental requirement for biographical articles. For help in learning how to add references please read Help:Referencing for beginners. The edits did appear to be promotional rather than biographic. There was a heavy emphasis on people other than Jewel herself, with a strong (repeated) insertion of a particular individual. Additionally you should very carefully read over the first part of your talk page regarding a conflict of interest. Wiki has articles written "about" not "for" someone.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:34, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:08, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Edit warring

Hi! I’m not sure if you’re the right person for this—I’m just reporting to the first person I see in the edit history of the Jenna Coleman article. There is an anonymous user who keeps adding unsourced information on what’s presumably Melia from Xenoblade Chronicles 3. As it stands, her role has not been confirmed for the this upcoming video game, even though Coleman is most likely reprising her role as Melia. How do I let this user know that unsourced information is discouraged on Wikipedia?—MomoQca (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Unfortunately dynamic IPs will change, so a message sent to one address will not be seen by another. If this persists you may request page protection or report that one user to WP:AIV and request a low–level range block.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 12:35, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
I see. Thank you!—MomoQca (talk) 13:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Ken Jacobs

Ken has a daughter named Nisi, who is also an experimental film maker. It seems unfair to mention her brother but not her. Here is a link to a showing of films at the Film Maker's Coop including her - https://vimeo.com/ondemand/survivalofnature

See underlined

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Scrubjay (talk • contribs) 20:58, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Please read Template:Infobox person for instructions on how to list children. Non-notable children, such as those without articles, should not be named. Feel free to write an article about her if you feel she meets notability guidelines.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 02:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikilinks style guidelines.

In the article on veil you keep reverting a correction to a wikilink. The version you keep reverting to doesn't follow wiki styling guidelines, as your revision requires readers chase links. It as well does not explain the subject that the link is of.

For more information please refer to the style manual — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:B400:5D2B:61FE:E00B:FF26:B3CD (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Perhaps it would be prudent for you to look up the definition of “nonsensical” for it does not appear to mean what you intend to say. The link to a section describing Colorado’s home rule municipality is neither nonsensical nor a style issue? There is specifically a section on linking to sections. Additionally you continue to inappropriately modify a citation, which at this point can be considered vandalism.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

  • Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Explain how that is disruptive editing.

Surely that edit at John Rogan would come under unsourced additions, are you trying to accuse me of something else? --BezosJohnson (talk) 19:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

As you have had multiple warnings for unsourced additions, a level–3 warning was given to you.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

New Page Review queue March 2022

Hello Loriendrew,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 814 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 859 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

New Page Review queue June 2022

Hello Loriendrew,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 9921 articles, as of 10:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Notes
  1. ^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
  2. ^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol | July 2022 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:25, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Glastonbury Attendance Figures

My change uses capacity to estimate attendance as the festival was sold out in 2022. The change you reverted to also uses capacity to estimate attendance except it is an outdated figure from 2019. Musicfestivalexpert (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Upon further inspection - I see it is a post festival attendance figure for 2019. Thank you. Musicfestivalexpert (talk) 21:49, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

New Page Review queue August 2022

Hello Loriendrew,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination
MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.
Open letter to the WMF
The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.
TIP - Reviewing by subject
Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.
New reviewers
The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.
Reminders
  • Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
  • If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
  • If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
  • To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

NPP message

Hi Loriendrew,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Board of Trustees election

Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2022 backlog drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles.
  • Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023

Information icon Hello, I'm CastJared. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jessica Jones (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CastJared (talk) 19:18, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

I forgot

I didn't know that Aardman Features was a division and not a parent name. Chiagozie Elobuike (talk) 23:49, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

About the article “1939”

Well, I wasn't doing a test that needed to be done in the sandbox, but I was customizing the events (and the references). Yes, several same-day events present there came from the same site (not random!), and I don't know why it's not clear, because if I took it and put it in the external links, it wouldn't be known about the existence of sources for *those* events . I don't do meaningless things! ESTÉFANO FRIGO ZAGO (talk) 15:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Michelle Enrile choking death

If you lived in the San Jose area in 1999-2001 that was the story everyone was talking about and also the court case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.232.17.9 (talk) 20:23, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

The court case and situation may be notable, unfortunately Michelle's event is a person notable for only one event which normally does not warrant an article. Also, she is one of many people who have chocked on this candy.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:36, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Tooth Fairy Article

Hey Loriendrew. I am asking that you did make a mistake to the Tooth Fairy Article. the stuff I added was that the Tooth Fairy also adds candy, and other items, not only a payment. Also I added a image caption. "People Dressing Up As The Tooth Fairy On Halloween". This stuff has to be added back. Gideonbratlandofficial (talk) 00:00, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

You did not add a caption, just unsourced age ranges and groups.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:02, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
I just added words to the page. I have no idea what ur talking about. Gideonbratlandofficial (talk) 00:05, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol | May 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive.
  • Article patrolling is not part of the drive.
  • Sign up here!
  • There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Eliza Taylor

You can drop by my User:Kizo2703/sandbox, take your time and see if everything is encyclopedic now? Most of it is waiting there for weeks. It's time that we edit Eliza Taylor's site properly. I look forward to your comments. Kizo2703 (talk) 14:38, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

If you would like, I can edit your sandbox to make some helpful style edits.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:49, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Yes, go ahead, do it. Kizo2703 (talk) 09:19, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
 Done} Take a look at the edit summaries to help with future inclusions. If you think it looks good, feel free to add it in, and replace what we changed.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Looks fine to me. Will do as soon get some free time. And thank you for your time. Kizo2703 (talk) 23:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Where is show preview?

I can't see the show preview button, I know it exists but can't see it. I have 2 screenshots as examples, one you can't see it at the bottom of the page, but in another you can, The screenshot where you can see it is on another wiki. I suspect that this has to do with me using legacy vector, not sure tho. Sebbog13 (talk) 15:10, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Ohh it shows up when you click Publish Changes, sorry I am so used to seeing it on the bottom on other wikis lmao. Sebbog13 (talk) 15:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

"Elle(film)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Elle(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 24 § Elle(film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 05:36, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Shaun Weiss

My year of birth is 1979. Please leave the DOB edit, and any other future edits to my team to correct. Thank you. ShaunWeiss (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Please see the Conflict of Interest notice on your talk page. Unsourced edits to biographies of living people may be removed if conflicting or unverifiable.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:13, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Fake you?

I assume this isn't you - Lonendrew (talk · contribs) 10mmsocket (talk) 08:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Not me! Interesting.. don't recall ever encountering that sock/master.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 10:27, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Reverted edits on Pop-punk

It appears that your reverted my edit to Pop-punk, in which, I added an image to the infobox describing how Green Day was the most successful of the genre. Your reasoning was that it was, "not appropriate for infobox". I disagree with this, as British Invasion, Smooth jazz, Rap rock, and especially Grunge have similar images and captions. In addition, I cited 2 sources and was stating a fact that they are the most successful of the genre. If you would like to open a discussion on the talk page or discuss it on here, that would be great. Sincerely, Key of G Minor. Tools: (talk, contribs) 01:00, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Pop-punk is not Green Day's primary genre, so stating they are the best selling artist is the equivalent of creative accounting. MOS:CAPLENGTH for infoboxes should be short and succinct, in this situation if it were appropriate, something like "Green Day in 2010" would be appropriate; as such it would not offer any information to contribute to understanding the topic. If you wish to include the image, please gain consensus on the talk page of the article.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:55, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol needs your help!

New pages awaiting review as of June 30th, 2023.

Hello Loriendrew,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

An Overlong but Superbly Written Response to Your Accusation

Thank you for advising me about adding defamatory content to Wikipedia. I know I've been bad, and were I a child, I'd suggest you paddle my bare bottom. (Isn't the subjunctive lovely? Would that it not be moribund in English.) I wish you were with me tonight. You could bathe me (très excitant!) and wrap me in my jammies and kindly advise me about all sorts of things. For you, after all, are a master intellect. For you, after all, with your wise and prophetic musings, are a modern-day Pythia (which--truth be told--makes me cry).

Now, lest I tax your patience, I proceed to the business of the court: I don't know who Melissa Benoist is, and am therefore confused and troubled by your charges. I searched for her at once on Wikipedia, but my (admittedly cursory) glance at her (very tedious) page failed to assuage my anxious bewilderment. (Please don't think that I'm denying your accusation, Pythia: I simply don't remember thinking of the bitch, let alone defaming her.) (Oh, bother! I must be careful. Let me assure you that I do not mean "bitch" in any pejorative sense.) Since I don't doubt that I said something, I assume that you were justified in taking offense. And I'm certain that having your nose in the air is a good look for you.

Eventually, of course, I shall be blocked from editing. Of this I am sure. But I don't want you to feel ever sorrow in your heart. Merci de ne pas! For I shall reveal to you a secret: I am a phoenix of Wikipedia. Once I rise triumphantly from the flames of my expulsion, I shall once again make my presence known by means of gentle observations and fabulous bons mots. (Oh, how this thought sustains me! Much like the spinster who misplaced a bratwurst in her underwear, I find myself almost giddy with pleasure!) (Gracious, I do overuse parenthetical asides, don't I? Um, er... not so fast! This does not mean that I am Joyce Carol Oates!! I'M NOT, I SWEAR IT!!!)

Anyhoo, it is time I retire, with my book and my nasal spray. (I'm rereading Descartes, Les passions de l'âme, and loving it!) As I say goodnight, may I ask a favor? Décontracte! It is not a big favor. It is simply this: go at once to your kitchen and open a drawer. Find something very sharp. Take it in hand and shove it so far up your ass that you cut your fucking tongue off. Bon appétit! I love you. Untold Millions (talk) 19:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

class parameter

In regards to my edits of "class parameters" that you have reverted I bundled the duplicate class parameter under {{wikiproject banner shell}}, which to me makes the templates look cleaner (I think is a rather recent change that was made to how the banner shell system works). I didn't think anybody would find such a change controversial or needing explaining, seeing as the class ranking is still maintained under the wpbs (and it's not as if any of these rankings where uniquely given by wikiprojects). Do you have any particular reason for wanting to keep the duplicate rankings instead of bundling them? Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 22:55, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

The use of edit summaries, of which you applied to none of the talk page edits, would have been helpful.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:35, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Global quality assessments

I noticed your recent rollbacks regarding removal of class parameters. The edits were in good faith, and a result of the unanimously supported Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 198#Project-independent quality assessments. Due to this, articles which are rated a certain quality level by all the WikiProjects on its talk page should have their rating move to the banner shell. This will automatically populate all relevant WikiPRoject categories. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 22:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Something like this should be mentioned in an edit summary. None of the rollbacks mentioned any rationale for the changes.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Thanks, I'm sure you're not at fault here because it is easy to miss out on developments like this, and without appropriate summaries, there's no way to know what's going on. I just wanted to inform you about the development. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 05:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

why revert

There is a mention of de Sade on Reve's wiki page, so why revert? Stop doing this. Thank you! Tjerkvermaning (talk) 13:38, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

You had just added an unsourced statement to Reve's article then added him as an influence to Sade. Please provide reliable sourcing.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:45, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Kate Todd

Explain to me why the IMDb, one of the most comprehensive documentation of entertainment details, is a poor source? Jaiquiero (talk) 01:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Please see WP:RS/IMDB.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 01:15, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol | October 2023 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Loriendrew/Archive_11&oldid=1200540214"