User talk:Loser user

Welcome!

Hello, Loser user, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like 1952–1953 United States network television schedule (weekday), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Vistro (talk) 04:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 1952–1953 United States network television schedule (weekday)[edit]

The article 1952–1953 United States network television schedule (weekday) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cruft?

This info is readily available elsewhere on the internet. It also lacks an introduction. It is nothing more than a graph.

Thoughts?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vistro (talk) 04:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jill Farren Phelps[edit]

Please note, I removed part of your comment here. It is not appropriate to describe a person in that way; it's fine to discuss the content of the article, but please avoid comments like that in future. Thank you for your understanding, Chzz ► 03:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you felt the need to delete something I said four years ago? Wow — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.34.71.227 (talk) 20:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Arthur (TV series). Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:38, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete please specify by what you mean, thank you!

You replaced all the comments with your own comment. That was unacceptable. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:42, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:B8E0:958A:EACE:C5B4:402A (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha, didn't mean to replace all the comments just responding to a personal attack I got from a user, will cease and desist.