User talk:Louis Sarwal

Section headings use sentence case[edit]

Doug Weller talk 19:01, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Taiwan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 23:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 12:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Louis Sarwal (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, "Doug Weller", I would agree that I am "clearly" not here to build an encyclopedia. Neither, of course are you. We are both here to EDIT an encyclopedia, to make it better than the base it was built on. We are both here for the same purpose, and I would like to kindly ask you to unblock me. Thank you, "Louis Sarwal"

Decline reason:

Sampling your edits, I found that your edits generally made the Wikipedia worse, not better. For example, how on earth was this edit remotely helpful and not just outright vandalism? Yamla (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your user page at User:Louis Sarwal also makes it clear your aim is to actively harm Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 21:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Louis Sarwal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:47, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.