User talk:LoveJapanChika

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my Wiki Talk Page[edit]

Ask me questions here - I'll be happy to help you! Visit my editor's toolbox for tips.


NipponSun7[edit]

  • Having any problems with users? NipponSun7
  • Will we get the murder victims category on Iwane Matsui's page? It does not stay there for long. User:NipponSun7
  • Working on it. Be careful with reverts: three in a row can cause a ban. Best to edit, wait, edit again. For better or worse Wikipedia is a literal democracy, so the side with the most editors wins in any edit-war. Bring your friends. LoveJapanChika (talk) 02:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Zero on Your Six[edit]

"You know, it's funny. I just wanted to walk on the beach and study the grass. Then some jerk in a ship shows up to poach coral."


Blocked[edit]

You are obviously the same person as the moderator "Chikako JTU" on a google + group, see the mention of this very usertalk page here, and you have called for meatpuppets to help push a particular POV on Japan articles: "I've opened a formal Wikipedia dispute at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nanking_Massacre. I need logged-in and anonymous pro-Japan editors to express their outrage with this article's bias and obscenity."[1] And you also call above for people to "Help and bring their friends". This is not what Wikipedia is for — please read the policy WP:SOCK. I have blocked your account indefinitely as you're clearly here with an agenda, and not to help create a neutral encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 22:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC).[reply]

  • Which makes my court-case for me, Bishonen. Wikipedia is permeated with systemic anti-Japanese bias. LoveJapanChika (talk) 02:26, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
There are wonderful medicines these days that psychiatry offers. Please look into therapy.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LoveJapanChika (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Systemic anti-Japanese bias on Wikipedia and false claims of sock-puppetry by accuser. LoveJapanChika (talk) 02:30, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 02:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Apposite Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 08:12, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Apposite Technologies Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Apposite Technologies Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!