User talk:Love your neighbor613

May 2023[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Del Bigtree. CityOfSilver 01:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you not blocked for pushing misinformation? Prove that anything I changed was incorrect. One thing you are changing back that is definitely incorrect, is that Del is anti-vaccine. Del has stated numerous times he is pro-informed consent and does not want to tell people what to do in regards to vaccines but let people make up their own mind. Love your neighbor613 (talk) 01:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Del Bigtree) for disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 02:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm being nice by blocking you only from editing the article, where you are obviously being disruptive. Now, you have the opportunity to read up on our guidelines, and then maybe start a conversation on the article talk page. Hint: we write what is verified by independent, reliable, secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not verify with primary sources like I did?

I verified with primary sources, you verify with secondary sources, who is more likely correct? Love your neighbor613 (talk) 02:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is an encyclopedia. We use secondary sources; that's how it works. Plus, a subject's own words are, well, hardly independent of the source. Drmies (talk) 02:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a administrator of Wikipedia or another user name of the previous person/group/program who does not want the entry to change? I am not sure which, but when you look at the comments of the revisions in the history back to the same group of entries, the different users have the same comments, which makes me think program. Love your neighbor613 (talk) 02:46, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And don't supply commentary inside article space as you did here. Drmies (talk) 02:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you suggest I convey the information in the future, I am open to suggestions. Love your neighbor613 (talk) 02:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: So I reported this person to AIV because they're clearly not here to help and they responded to their partial block by adding an outrageous edit to Informed Consent Action Network while, uh, accusing me of being a computer program. Would you indefinitely block them per WP:NOTHERE? CityOfSilver 02:54, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could the actual administrator of Wikipedia please look into my claims about these 2 people, or group, as they are putting on a facade of being helpful but are obviously just trying to push misinformation. If an actual Wikipedia administrator wants to, please contact my email to get into a deeper discussion with a lot more primary sources. I don't know the specific terminology used in Wikipedia, so I am using general terminology. Love your neighbor613 (talk) 03:01, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to help here, I really do. I hope you see the light someday, that perhaps you're getting misinformed yourself. But right now, you're not being very helpful with your edits. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 03:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please be specific? So far I keep asking for proof my edits are incorrect and instead of an appropriate answer, I get a group of people who say instead I am misinformimg people, without proof to back up their statements.

It is as if you don't want to let anyone else have a say on the mater and only your group are allowed to change the entry or else you unreasonably block them. Love your neighbor613 (talk) 03:27, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

According to my opinion, you passed the Turing Test, I no longer think you are a program, at least in this discussion. My next question is, are you one person using multiple user names or are you a group of people who want to prevent anyone from making changes to specific entries in Wikipedia you don't approve of, or some mixture there of? Love your neighbor613 (talk) 03:35, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. CityOfSilver 05:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Nope" is pretty vague, could you please be more specific? Love your neighbor613 (talk) 14:40, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contribs)} 05:15, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do I get access to that group? Love your neighbor613 (talk) 14:42, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Anti-vaccine POV pusher on Del Bigtree. You are able to comment. – bradv 15:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 18:43, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]