User talk:Loveinfo123

February 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Jodie Fisher has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jodie Fisher was changed by Loveinfo123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87838 on 2018-02-26T22:36:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:36, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Jodie Fisher. Thank you.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:14, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:15, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:19, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Jodie_Fisher Thank you. Jaydoggmarco (talk) 22:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Loveinfo123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Jodie Fisher, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 18:43, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Your recent editing history at Jodie Fisher shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jodie Fisher, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:36, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

banner blindness warning[edit]

Just so we're clear, Wikipedia operates on verifiability and consensus. Content in articles has to represent what reliable sources say, not necessarily what we think is true. If you disagree with content or the supprting sources, you need to discuss this on the article's talk page and develop consensus there. Without consensus, you cannot make changes because you have already been reverted by multiple editors. If you cannot understand that Wikipedia works this way then you need to leave Wikipedia. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:39, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]