User talk:Lowlihao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Super Sentai airing in China needs a source. Also, you shouldn't bold the section title.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:48, 24 December 2012 (UTC) Welcome![reply]

March 2013[edit]

Hello, Lowlihao, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Nintendo 3DS have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or you can type {{helpme}} on your user page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  GoneIn60 (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Megaforce[edit]

Do not add anything about Gokaiger unless there's something in the end credits that says "Gokaiger". The mere fact you can identify things from Gokaiger in Megaforce is considered original research and not allowed.—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Super Robot Chogokin, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Areaseven (talk) 10:35, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you forgotten this? Do not say Super Megaforce is Gokaiger until there's something in writing that confirms this.—Ryulong (琉竜) 13:41, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Astro Prima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Astro Prima is currently available for free-to-view on [[Astro (Malaysian satellite television|Astro]] and [[NJOI]] customers in Malaysia on Channel 105.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:45, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Astro Prima may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Ceria Popstar 2 (also aired on [[Astro Ceria]] and [[Maya HD|Astro Maya HD]] (grand finale only)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:17, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to TV1 (Malaysia) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • | sat serv 3 = [[NJOI]] (Malaysia]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Astro (Malaysian satellite television) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * 731 [[Bio. (South East Asia)|Bio.]] (Rebroadcast soon in HD]]
  • | ESPN and STAR Sports in SDTV, Channel 830 in HDTV and Channel 840 in 3DTV)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Astro Prima may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Ceria Popstar 2 (also aired on [[Astro Ceria]] and [[Maya HD|Astro Maya HD]] (grand finale only)
  • * Maharaja Lawak Mega 2014 (also aired on [[Mustika HD|Astro Mustika HD and [[Astro Warna]]) (Kerusi Panas and first episode only)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014[edit]

Hi, Lowlihao. We do not predict the future. We report those notable events and subjects that can be supported by independent, secondary sources. Also, once one of your edits has been reverted, you should not simply reinsert the content. That is called edit warring (see WP:Edit warring). Your first step after having been reverted is to discuss the content and establish a consensus (see WP:BRD and WP:Consensus). Regards Tiderolls 12:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tiderolls 13:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider making a response at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lowlihao reported by User:Tide rolls (Result: ). At first sight your behavior is strange, and admins might be tempted to block your account. In spite of your many reverts you have never left a comment at Talk:Astro (television) or tried to persuade anyone else that your changes are correct. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warned for edit warring at Astro (television)[edit]

Please see this AN3 complaint about you (permalink). You are constantly making edits at Astro (television) that others disagree with. In your entire history on Wikipedia you have never left a message on a talk page or an edit summary. You are expected to collaborate with others to reach consensus. Please be aware if you continue to edit Astro (television) and other articles with no regard for others' views you may be blocked for edit warring. If your reluctance to discuss is due to concern about your English ability, you might consider editing a version of Wikipedia in your own language. See List of Wikipedias for the languages that are available. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:05, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You resumed the edit war on 6 November. It does not seem you pay attention to any feedback from others. A discussion took place here about the future of your account. Since you never respond, and you keep on reverting the article, our only option may be to block your account for a month. Feel free to respond, if you are able. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 14:58, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Astro (television), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Astro Arena. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Neo Heisei"[edit]

Do not use this term anywhere on the English Wikipedia. This is not an official term or even a reliably sourced fan term. It is a term solely used on the Kamen Rider Wikia which is not to be used at all on this website. There is no such thing as "Neo-Heisei". While the production teams did note that there was a change, it is not an official division.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 06:49, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop using "Neo-Heisei". This is not a term allowed on the English Wikipedia. There is no such thing as "neo-Heisei" like there is no such thing as "mireniamu". The Heisei period is named as such because Akihito is the Emperor of Japan and he is known as the "Heisei Emperor". Just because there was a division between Decade and Double does not mean that you get to invent a new term to define everything that came after.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:26, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Power Rangers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.Bettering the Wiki (talk) 09:49, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Continuing to change content without citing a reliable source will jeopardize your editing privilege. Tiderolls 16:22, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Astro Xi Yue HD (TV channel)[edit]

Hello Lowlihao,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Astro Xi Yue HD (TV channel) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. One life to live (talk) 19:03, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Astro NJOI) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Astro NJOI, Lowlihao!

Wikipedia editor Denver20 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

On Behalf of Wikipedia, I thank you for your Contributions in making this Page... your help and support is Appreciated.Denver C. (talk) 10:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Denver20's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Astro NJOI cut and paste page move[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give NJOI a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Astro NJOI. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. -- Wikipedical (talk) 20:58, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to DVB-T may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * {{flag|Albania}} (uses [[MPEG-2]] for SD and [[MPEG-4 AVC /H.264]] for HD transmissions.
  • * {{flag|Singapore}} (4 DVB-T Channels in 1 January 2007 and 7 DVB-T2 Channels in 13 December 20130

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:36, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since you never responded to my original post I have no idea why you continue to add content that predicts the future. This type of content is a violation of Wikipedia policy; please read the policy subsection linked in this section title. At some point your continuing this behavior will become disruptive and could jeopardize you editing privilege. Please stop. Tiderolls 18:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now you have seen fit to edit war to add policy violating content to several articles. The relevant policy can be found by clicking on the title to this section. If you do not self revert and discuss your changes you will be reported to the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Tiderolls 12:23, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bloomberg TV Malaysia, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://www.linkedin.com/company/bloomberg-tv-malaysia.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:42, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 6 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTDIR[edit]

Please refrain from adding channel numbers to articles, as you have at Astro NJOI and Astro B.yond, since that violates WP:NOTDIR – Wikipedia is not a directory. Your edits violate policy and will be reverted. And also, please use an edit summary. -- Wikipedical (talk) 09:40, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're edit warring again[edit]

You really need to read WP:Edit warring so that you may avoid future blocks. Eventually the disruption caused by your edit warring will reach the point where you will permanently jeopardize your editing privilege. I am watch listing this page in the event you require clarification. Tiderolls 15:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

  • Until you understand Wikipedia's policy regarding edit warring and agree to follow the project's convention regarding dispute resolution, you will continue to jeopardize your editing privilege. As always, I will make myself available to answer questions or concerns with regard to policies and guidelines. Tiderolls 10:56, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lowlihao (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked from disruptive editing, vandalism editing and repeated use of sock puppets to evade blocking. If I'll be unblocked, I will rewrite my article trying to not do promotion but only information.

Decline reason:

While you describe the reasons for your block, you do not address your past conduct at all. I see no reason to expect that the same issues would not recur if you were unblocked. Huon (talk) 10:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Advice[edit]

Your unblock request cannot be addressed as posted. Please read the instructions in the block message. I will say that I see competency problems with your request in addition to the fact that you have not mentioned your repeated sock puppetry. If read here you will see that your block was extended because you kept creating accounts to evade this block. Tiderolls 16:11, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lowlihao (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was blocked because i force to create new account for many times to create new pages such as TV channels, video games, Radio channels, TV shows and many more, this is also my duty to create new pages, new promotion and history to know where the TV channels, Radio channels, TV shows and video games to launch in past, present, future and far away when i needed. If I and my multiple account will be unblocked, I and my multiple account will trying to rewrite my article or trying to find a new promotion and information.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, if you're asking for your multiple accounts to be unblocked, then you clearly don't understand the problems here. I suspect that English is probably not your first language, but unless you can make it clear in English that you understand the problems and can convince an admin that those problems will not recur, then you are not going to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Then Revenge[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lowlihao (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

that User:Tide rolls, User:MER-C and User:JamesBWaston with his alternative accounts is trying to make me a fool!! Until i and my alternative accounts is unblock, i will going to destroy them, kill them, bully them and block them with no expiry set at the same time at the cost and may them pay for them who are not respect the king and make them jail!!

Decline reason:

Death threats will not get you unblocked, and they're so far beyond the acceptable that even "venting" is not an excuse. Talk page access revoked. Huon (talk) 00:37, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lowlihao. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]