User talk:Ltrzeciak12

Hi at school, study hall. Ltrzeciak12 (talk) 12:04, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm JaconaFrere. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to A because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Jacona (talk) 12:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elmo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Elmo was changed by Ltrzeciak12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90339 on 2014-09-23T14:17:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Freshwater snail with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 14:17, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas the Tank Engine, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Logan Trzeciak[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Logan Trzeciak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PK T(alk) 11:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Radbyrne[edit]

The article Ryan Radbyrne has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ochib (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ryan Radbyrne[edit]

Hello, Ltrzeciak12,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ryan Radbyrne should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Radbyrne .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mabalu (talk) 09:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Logan Trzeciak[edit]

Hello Ltrzeciak12,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Logan Trzeciak for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 14:07, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]