User talk:LuNaCy

This is LuNaCy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Matt Walsh (pundit) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Matt Walsh (pundit). Thanks! HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:59, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Walsh (pundit) (February 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mhawk10 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I'm seeing quite a few low-quality sources in the article. This is a biography of a living person. I have very little doubt that Matt Walsh is notable, but the article needs to be cleaned up to be brought into the mainspace. The use of future tense to describe perpetual behaviors of Walsh is generally informal, while there seems to be quite a bit of spin in the way many of the sources are used. In general, WP:NOR and WP:NPOV command that we write what our sources say, no more and no less. We do not that we look at our sources, analyze them, and then write something that is different than they claim (original research/synthesis) nor do we present article subjects in a way that the tone of the reliable sources don't actually support (POV spinning). This needs substantial work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Walsh (pundit) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Matt Walsh (pundit), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Mhawk10 (talk) 04:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LuNaCy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:54, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]